Page 0036

APR_10_EB_p36-37 Debate:EB_Layout 3 11/03/2010 18:54 Page 36

THE DEBATE Benji Acol is

a good system

Two top players debate a hot bridge topic. Tell us whose argument

has won you over by e-mailing the Editor at elena@ebu.co.uk

Andrew Kambites

frozen out. East, realising that his side has the level of 3NT. Balanced hands of this

a ten-card fit, bumps up the bidding to the strength do not often occur but when they

IN order to recommend Benji Acol, two level of the fit. do, they frequently need the space for dis-

fundamental questions must be asked: Both 4™ and 4´ easily make. Of course, cussion towards the best slam.

i) What is Benji Acol? either auction may follow a different path:

ii) For whom am I recommending it? for example, in Auction 2 North may over- HHHHH

My answers will follow at the end. call 2´ with 3™, but still North-South will

Acol started with a basis of Strong Twos not be allowed to buy the contract in 4™. So, let’s answer the questions at the start.

and Weak Threes. However, it became fairly To answer i):

obvious that Weak Two bids are highly HHHHH

effective. As with all pre-emptive bids, they a) I am recommending Benji Acol where

deprive opponents of space for scientific Weak Twos became popular. Some part- Weak Twos are sensibly defined as a

bidding, but it is also very true that in nerships play three Weak Twos, but they good six-card suit and not much out-

competitive auctions the side that stakes then have the problem of fitting all their side, and where the partnership puts

its patch early has the advantage. strong hands into two bids: 2® and 2NT. some reasonable work into discussing

Others play their Weak Twos as part of a how to deal with the strong hands. I

Multi 2t , and play all other two-level am not advocating a style of random

Game All. Dealer West. openings except 2® as weak two-suiters. Weak Twos, particularly in first or

´ J This needs a lot of work, particularly in second seat.

™ K9632 defining strong hands. Benji Acol is an b) I am not advocating the nonsense of

t A9853 excellent compromise. You use opening an opening 2NT bid as showing 19-20

® KJ 2™ and 2´ bids as Weak Twos. That still points. It always mystifies me why

´ K Q 10 7 6 5 ´ A842 leaves 2®, 2t and 2NT available for the anybody would choose to open a

™ 4 N ™ 875 strong hands. You don’t have a weak 2t balanced 19 points at the two level.

W E

t K6 S t QJ42 bid available, but since that takes up less This is not an integral part of Benji.

® 9432 ® A 10 space, it is the least effective of the three c) I am not advocating the regrettably

´ 93 commonly played Weak Two openings. common habit of opening a Benji 2®

™ A Q J 10 with pre-emptive hands, for example:

t 10 7 HHHHH ´ K 7 2 ™ 7 t A K J 8 7 5 4 2 ® 7 5.

® Q8765 Good bridge dictates opening this

Benji is often regarded as sacrificing the with a high-level diamond pre-empt.

definition of strong hands for the pre- Even if you can find a way to describe

Auction 1 emptive gain of the Weak Twos. However, this as eight playing tricks, it is not a

West North East South reducing five strong opening bids (2® hand of power and quality that can

Pass 1™ Pass 3™ through to 2NT) to three (2®, 2t, 2NT) be represented as an Acol-two bid.

Pass 4™ All Pass actually increases your definition for Those who play Benji Acol need to

balanced hands. You now have three ways recognise that not only is opening

Auction 2 of starting a strong balanced hand (2NT, this hand 2® bad bridge, it is not a

West North East South 2® and 2t) instead of two (2NT and 2®). permitted method (see the EBU

2´ Pass 4´ All Pass I suggest you use 2NT as 20-22, 2® Orange and Tangerine books).

followed by a 2NT rebid as 23-24 and 2t

This hand is fairly mundane, but look at followed by a 2NT rebid as 25-26. In Acol To answer ii): I am recommending Benji

the difference between the two auctions. you would have to open a balanced 25-26, Acol for improving partnerships who want

In Auction 1 West is not playing Weak with 2® and rebid 3NT over 2t, an ugly, to put opponents under pressure but don’t

Twos, and East-West end up frozen out of space-consuming bid that makes it impos- have the time available to discuss more

the auction. In Auction 2 it is North that is sible to use Stayman and transfers below complex systems. r

36 English Bridge April 2010 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Number 228
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048