Page 0032

LETTERS CONTINUED from page 31

The June Debate

I HAVE played a weak no- ALTHOUGH Alan Mould

trump for over fifty years (just makes some interesting points,

changed over to 15-17 and I believe that there are few

The three Lethal Five-card majors) and I never occasions when it does not pay

use Stayman on 4-3-3-3 shaped to use Stayman when you have

tests weapon hands. (Mr Reuben Myers a four-card major opposite a

taught me not to in 1959 – look 1NT opening bid.

I WAS surprised to see Heather REGARDING the 4NT Open- him up in the Bridge Encyclo- If it can be proven that both

Dhondy recommending a Benji ing Bid convention described pedia.) hands are distributed 4-3-3-3

2® opener in her June 2010 by Sandra Landy in the June Mainly for two reasons: with then clearly 3NT is better odds

article ‘Ask Heather’. This hand issue, maybe not many people game values, by bidding 3NT than four of a major. The same

(´ AKQ109643 ™ 6 t 72 ® A5) know that this was invented by immediately I give away the can be true in many other

is only 13 HCP plus 10 for Culbertson in 1934, as part of least amount of information. cases and so it is necessary to

suits so does not qualify under the Culbertson Four-Five No- Secondly, I was taught that the be able to determine the full

the rule of 25. trump convention, well des- idea of opening 1NT is to tell distribution in order to make

Several readers cribed in S.J. Simon’s Design for partner: ‘I have a balanced an informed decision. There is

(all of whom shall remain Bidding. Simon commented: hand and 12-14 points.’ usually an extra trick to be had

anonymous) ‘Blackwood is a toy, the Four- So even if partner’s shape is playing in the 4-4 fit whenever

five no-trump is an adult 4-4-3-2, his shortage is likely one hand holds a doubleton. It

The hand, and Heather’s recom- weapon.’ to be my length. and if he is is not too difficult to discover

mendation, had been checked by G.S. Hathorn, Sawston 3-3-3-4 all the better for 3NT. opener’s full distribution so

Jeremy Dhondy, Chairman of the It must be fairly plain I long as you limit the number

Laws & Ethics Committee, who re- agree with Alan Mould: ‘Do of hand types that the 1NT

minds us that to open it with a Detail not use Stayman on flat hands.’ opening bid shows. Then it is

Benji 2®, a hand has to fulfill one Raymond Semp, MCBA possible to use, as I do, a relay

of three criteria: ‘It fails Test 1 (16+ FULVIO Fantoni gave us a bid of 3® to find out more

points),’ writes Jeremy. ‘It fails Test 2 great tip in the June issue – it’s ALAN Mould made a poor case about opener’s hand.

(Rule of 25). It passes Test 3: eight good to be reminded that for not using Stayman when The problem, of course, is

clearcut tricks and the points nor- manners are important at the responder is 4-3-3-3. He does, that the 3® relay has to replace

mally associated with a one-level bridge table. however, make some good whatever you usually use this

opening. There are seven tricks in Indeed his profile was one points: bid for. You must consider

spades (not eight because with the of the best in the ‘A Day in the • Not using Stayman may whether the sacrifice is worth-

second worst break of 4-1 you Life of ’ series, especially since induce a bad lead and while. Obviously, I think it is.

would only have seven) but the Fulvio did not tell us what he gives no information to I can supply full details of

presence of an ace gives you the has for breakfast. That sort of opponents. the methods that I use if any-

eighth trick. With K-x, not A-x, 2® detail is best left out of print. • Often, even when one one is interested.

would not be a legal opening.’ Gerry Jones, Sheffield suit is completely un - Paul Whetton,

protected the defence can- whetton@btinternet.com

not or do not cash five

CONGRATULATIONS . . . tricks.

. . . to June Booty and Derek

• When you have plenty of Analysis

points (27 plus between

Taplin, who got married on you) the strength can WITH reference to Gunnar

26th June in Lightwater.

overcome bad breaks. Hallberg’s 7t hand (June

June and Derek started

His argument is weakened by issue), if play proceeded as des-

going out two and half years

ago and after six months

the fact that he does not cribed, the grand slam could

Derek realised he was going distinguish between pairs and still have been beaten on the

to have to learn bridge . . . teams/rubber. Personally, I ´K lead, if East had discarded

would bid Stayman with his/her three clubs at tricks

Derek is a Logistics Mana-

North’s hand at pairs and 3NT four, six and eight.

ge ment Consultant and

works away in Derby during at teams in the North-South Now declarer cannot enter

the week at the moment, so diagram that Alan features. dummy with the ®J at trick

June located a bridge club in For her part, Frances Hinden nine, because East would ruff,

Derby where he could have drops in the excellent comment and cash ™K.

lessons. She has also recom- on continuation after a major I’m sure Gunnar would have

mended that he reads her fit is found. Food for thought countered, however, by enter-

articles in English Bridge, and discussion. ing dummy with ®J at trick

which Derek says he finds A very worthwhile debate. seven, and ™A at trick nine!

very useful! Anthony Moon, by e-mail Simon Few, Corby

32 English Bridge August 2010 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056