Page 0037



alerts and agreements

E-mail your questions to Jeremy Dhondy at

or write to the editor, Elena Jeronimidis, at 23 Erleigh Road, Reading RG1 5LR.

Please include your name and address even if writing by e-mail.

offending side to decide whether they Jeremy Dhondy

OLIVIA MARTIN, via e-mail, asks: would likely have moved 2® to another

The dealer, my partner, opened 1t contract. You resolve minor areas of doubt

and an opponent overcalled 2™. The in favour of the non-offending side. If a prepared, phoney, short or nebulous

overcall was a weak hand containing a I would probably adjust the score. I 1® or 1t bid is doubled, then the

six-card heart suit. Should the bid be would listen to the players to help me expectation is that the double will be for

announced (Weak), or should it be decide what to adjust it to. It doesn’t much take out. If it is, then no action is needed.

alerted, or neither? matter what the popular contracts were as If it is anything else, then an alert is needed.

they won’t have been reached via this The answer therefore is that it should have

auction. been alerted.

It should neither be announced nor Assuming East-West forgot and it was a A 1® or 1t bid showing fewer than three

alerted. No overcalls are announced. The one-off occasion, I would settle for a score cards must be alerted (not announced)

short list of what is announced is on page adjustment and a finger wagging. If they because it is regarded as artificial, but it is

4 of the Tangerine Book, available from were serial offenders, I might give them a common for players to play the double, and page 19 in this issue. procedural penalty as well but I would not and other bids like a cue-bid as the same

You are not expected to alert any natural do this for a first offence. as they would if the opening were natural,

jump overcall whatever the strength. I would treat West’s assertion that he thus the alerting regulation is the same for

would bid 3t over 2™ with some caution. a natural 1®, or one of the bids shown

Why would he do this but not bid 2t over above. The ‘What to Alert’ card produced

JOHN PICKERING, via e-mail, asks: the penalty double of 2®? He knows there by the EBU and downloadable from www.

Can you please clarify the law on this is a misfit because he knows his partner

particular auction? has doubled 2® for penalties and may be Cards-SystemsInformation/Announce

about to do the same to 2™ if he gets a ments%20Table.pdf gives the answers.

West North East South chance. To bid 3t when he would not bid

Pass Pass 2t is a strange action!

1´ 2® Dble All Pass RON WEBB, by e-mail, asks: I was

told that it is not legal to agree to play

The double was not alerted. East held D. DONNISON by e-mail says: My an opening bid of 3´ to show a

six clubs and West held a singleton. partner and I play five-card majors gambling 3NT bid. Is this correct?

The contract went two down for a top and a strong no-trump. To deal with

for East-West. The director was called 12-14 hands and no five-card major,

and South said that with six hearts we open with a forcing 1® which we The answer is: it depends. Years ago a

and a singleton club he would have always announce as a possible phoney number of players agreed to play some

removed the contract to 2™ had the club. The other evening my LHO funny three-level bids called Alder Threes

double been alerted, and West said he doubled my opening 1®. The double which included the use of 3´ as a solid

would have continued to 3t, the was not alerted so I took it to be a minor. It is legal to do this at Level 4, i.e. in

popular contract for East-West. take-out double. My partner replied almost all EBU tournaments and in many

with 1™. In fact the doubler had a clubs. Some clubs, however, agree to play

strong six-card club suit, her partner at a level lower than 4 and if they do, then

First of all, it’s not law, it’s regulation (i.e. passed and I rebid my five-card club this opening is not permitted. r

what is in the Orange/Tangerine Book). suit to show a genuine suit. I went

If the double was a penalty double by four down for minus 200 and a

agreement and there was no alert, then bottom. Since the 1® opening could When you have finished reading

there is a breach of the alerting regulations. show a genuine club suit or could be this magazine, if you don’t want

The club distribution suggests that this is so. an opening gambit, should any double

to keep it, please recycle it.

To decide whether this has caused be alerted?

damage, you look at the hands of the non- August 2010 English Bridge 37


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056