Page 0036

Beat today’s

BIDDING QUIZ

experts

David Bird Bidding problems are on page 29

1. E/W Game. Dealer North. ner, Fabienne Pigeaud, bids 2t. How strong is round control in hearts.’

this, would you say? Pigeaud could now visualize a low point-

´ A9 ´ K J 10 8 6 Some players treat a change-of-suit as forcing count slam. Partner’s heart cue-bid was likely

™ 972 N ™ 10 opposite an overcall. Beginners’ books tend to to be a shortage after North’s strong rebid. She

W E

t A 10 8 7 6 4 3 S t K52 promote this treatment because it is easier to surely held the ®A as well, to justify making a

® 3 ® AKJ6 teach! Most of the bridge magazine systems cue-bid. Seven diamonds, three black-suit

(used by their expert bidding panels) describe tricks and two heart ruffs would add up to

West North East South

such a change of suit as ‘constructive but non- twelve. If only one heart ruff was safe, because

Pigeaud Neve Fishpool Bessis

1™ 1´ Pass forcing’. I think this is the best method. of a possible overruff, a fourth black-suit trick

2t 3™ 4™ Pass North rebid 3™ and Fishpool had to calcu- would come to the rescue. She leapt to 6t,

6t late her next move on a hand with a good fit completing a splendid auction.

for partner’s diamonds. Her choice was 4™, a

We start at the final of the French Ladies Trials. cue-bid with the message: ‘I have a good dia- n Awards: 6t (10), 5t (7), 4´ (6), 6´ (3).

Catherine Fishpool overcalls 1´ and her part- mond fit, a strong hand and first- or second-

ship of Boye Brogeland and Erik Sælensminde indicated the ´A (or a void spade) by cue-

2. N/S Game. Dealer East. from Norway. East’s rebid of 2t was a reverse bidding 5´, Brogeland would have invited a

´ J 10 6 2 ´ 8 (a bid in a new suit that is higher than two of grand slam by bidding 5NT.

™ AKQJ3 N ™ 7 the first suit). As such, it was forcing for one East in fact bid 5NT himself. This meant: ‘I

W E

t 63 S t AKJ9 round. do not have first-round spade control but other-

® QJ ® AK98652 Brogeland bid fourth suit forcing and wise I have an excellent hand.’ Knowing there

Sælensminde made the unexpected rebid of was a top loser in spades, Brogeland signed off

West North East South 5®. What would your reaction have been on in 6®.

Brogeland Gromov S’minde Dubinin At the other table West reached the less

the West cards?

1® Pass

East had suggested 4-7 shape in the minors. impressive contract of 6NT. North, who held

1™ 1´ 2t Pass

2´ Pass 5® Pass This was not the moment for West to worry the ´A-K, very wisely did not double. He could

5™ Pass 5NT Pass that there might be two top spade losers and I not stand the thought of waiting for partner to

6® fully expected Brogeland to raise to 6®. No, he find the right lead against a retreat to 7®!

made a grand-slam try of 5™! He was looking

This deal is from a 2010 Vanderbilt match and for a grand slam, should East hold the ´A, tA n Awards: 6® (10), 6™ (7), games (5),

features the exciting world-champion partner- and long clubs headed by the A-K. If East had grands/6NT (3).

3. N/S Game. Dealer West. The remaining deals all come from the 2010 better bid! He cue-bid spades for a second

European championship in Ostend. Italy faced time. Since the bidding was already committed

´ AK765 ´ Void Germany on this deal and Lorenzo Lauria’s 2t to 6t, this was a grand-slam try. He must

™ 8652 N

™ AK response was forcing to game. The bidding therefore hold the ®A as well as the ´K.

W E

t 4 S t A K Q 10 9 8 5 3 2 continued to 3NT and Lauria’s 4t was then a The splendid 5´ bid would have allowed

® A 10 4 ® 87 slam try, based on a massive diamond suit. Lauria to bid 7NT if he held three low clubs

Alfredo Versace’s 4´ was a cue-bid, showing and one diamond fewer. As it was, Lauria

West East could count fourteen tricks and bid 7NT.

the ace or king of spades. Lauria’s 5™ was also

Versace Lauria

1´ 2t a cue-bid but it carried the message that he Most pairs reached this top spot, although

2™ 3t did not hold any control in the club suit; oth- some unaccountably chose 7t instead. Poor

3NT 4t erwise he would have cue-bid 5® instead. San Marino ended in 3t after a bidding mis-

4´ 5™ What should West bid next? understanding.

5´ 7NT

Some players would cue-bid 6® to show

that they had first-round control in the suit n Awards: 7NT (10), 7t (8), 6NT (5) 6t (4),

where partner had no control. West found a games (1).

36 English Bridge October 2010 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056