Page 0016

Teams Tactics by Derek Patterson

All Guns Blazing!

IMAGINE THAT you are South with the to create swings, in the hope that these successful finesse might still achieve the

following hand: turn out to be favourable. It is inadvisable, desired swing because, at the other table,

however, to take long-shots as these they would probably play for the drop, or

´ A J 10 8 2 You are the dealer invariably turn a difficult situation into maybe start with the king first. Accordingly,

™ AQJ52 and open 1´, partner one that is insurmountable. the jack of spades was run and when East

t K7 raising to 3´. How The recommended approach is to make showed out, the slam had been brought

® 3 should you proceed? a bid or play that is just slightly against the home – with some panache!

To make slam a cer- odds. In this way, hopefully, the opponents Here is the full deal:

tainty, partner seems to will not make the same decision and there

require the ´K-Q and two aces, or ´K-Q, will still be a reasonable chance (close to

™K and one ace, neither being possible 50%) of success, thereby creating a Game All. Dealer South.

after the limit raise. It is conceivable that positive swing for the trailing side. Contract: 6´. Lead: ™8.

partner has something akin to: How would these circumstances affect ´ K954

´ K 7 5 3 ™ 7 6 3 t A 5 2 ® A 9 2 the decision on our featured deal? When ™ K7

when 6´ would be a reasonable the hand actually occurred, opener recog- t A863

proposition but opposite some respond- nised a perfect opportunity to substan- ® J 10 8

ing hands such as: tially reduce the opponents’ lead and via ´ Q76 ´ 3

´ K 7 5 3 ™ K 7 t 10 9 5 ® K Q 10 4 the auction detailed below, bid up to 6´. ™ 83 N ™ 10 9 6 4

W E

it would be desirable to play in 4´ and no To do this missing two aces would have t J954 S t Q 10 2

higher. On that basis, under normal cir- been reckless but to bid slam missing the ® K652 ® AQ974

cumstances, either opener should bid 4´, queen of trumps and one ace represented ´ A J 10 8 2

or choose a slam-try, such as 4™, thereby a fair shot. On the lead of the ™8, the ™ AQJ52

consulting partner. dummy went down and in order to make t K7

Playing teams, however, there will the slam, declarer had to negotiate the ® 3

be circumstances under which a more following trump suit:

aggressive approach could be condoned.

The point is that teams bridge is played in ´K954 North South

matches, one team against another. In W

N

E

certain forms, such as a knock-out S

3´ 4NT

competition, the sole objective is to win ´ A J 10 8 2 5™1 6´

any given match – the margin of victory Pass

being irrelevant. If, when nearing the end He started with the ace of spades and

of an encounter, one team is a long way continued with the jack of spades, with 1 Showing two key cards, in this case

behind, that team should be prepared to both opponents following (West twice). the ´K and the tA and also denying

take more risks than normal, in order to Normally, with four cards missing, the the ´Q.

make up the lost ground. drop would be preferred although the

For example, if, after twenty-four boards odds between this and taking the finesse South’s bidding and play had been

in a 32-board match, a team found itself are very close. Hence, South identified a designed to create a positive swing for his

40 IMPs behind, then the players of that further chance to create a swing, reasoning side without taking any ridiculous risks.

team should realise that they are unlikely that although the bidding had been opti- The bidding rated to prove successful

to recoup the deficit by utilising normal mistic, the contract was reasonable and quite often (say 40 % of the time) and the

tactics. They must go down fighting and the opponents in the other room might situation demanded some lively action.

the most sensible strategy would be to try have reached the same spot. In that case, a The rationale was that a 40% chance to

greatly reduce the gap was worth taking

when, otherwise, the odds of overcoming

2011-2012 NICKO: Congratulations to Cambridge A (Chris Jagger, such a large deficit were very poor indeed.

Jon Cooke, Jonathan Mestel and Julian Wightwick) who have won the 2011/12 Desperate times call for desperate

National Inter-Club Knockout. They beat Cheltenham B by 43 IMPs in the final. measures.

The chosen line of play was adopted on

16 English Bridge February 2013 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056