Page 0014

DEC_EB_p14-15 Bird 16/11/07 10:10 am Page 14

Beat today’s

BIDDING QUIZ

experts

David Bird Bidding problems on page 1 of the pull-out at the centre of the magazine

1. N/S Game. Dealer East. THE deal comes from the final of the 2007 tricks in no-trumps via a simple squeeze in

Australian Interstate Teams, with ACT fac- the minor suits. It was not, however, as

♠ 95 ing South Australia. It is not often that you good as a grand slam in either major suit,

♥ 85 hold 25 points when partner opens with a which would have been a 95% prospect.

♦ KJ964 one-bid. Quite rightly, Barbara Travis Playing in a major, you can overcome a bad

♣ J 10 7 4 responded at the one-level to hear some- club break simply by ruffing the ♦Q.

♠ AKJ3 ♠ Q 10 8 2

Hands where you have to judge the best

♥ AKQ3 N

♥ J 10 9 7 thing worthwhile from partner’s rebid. Bob

♦ AQ

W

S

E

♦ Void Bignall’s 3♦ was a mini-splinter, showing denomination are notoriously difficult. If

♣ Q95 ♣ AK862 the values to raise hearts to the three level East had held the ♣J instead of the ♥J, you

♠ 764 and at most one card in the diamond suit. would rather be in 7NT than seven of a

♥ 642

What should West do now? major. Which contract did you choose?

♦ 10 8 7 5 3 2

♣ 3 On many deals it is right to play in 6NT

or 7NT, rather than in a suit. You may then I Awards: 7♠/7♥ – 10, 7NT – 8, 7♣ – 6,

West North East South have a chance of making the required tricks small slams – 3, games – 1.

Travis Vaughan Bignall Smart even when the suit that you might other-

1♣ Pass wise have chosen as trumps fails to break.

1♥ Pass 3♦ Pass Travis duly leapt to 7NT. This was indeed

7NT

superior to 7♣, as she proved by making 13

2. N/S Game. Dealer East. Next we see a very difficult board from a missing ace-queen and ace in his long suits

friendly match played between England and is unlikely to have two top losers in

(de Botton) and Norway (Hauge) at the spades in addition. The worry is that West’s

♠ J52

♥ J543 Brighton Summer Congress. 4NT might be based on a weakish hand that

♦ 63 Nick Sandqvist’s 4NT indicates two suits was aiming only at a sacrifice.

♣ K652 – we can all agree on that. What strength There is no ‘right answer’ in these situa-

♠ Void 84 ♠ does it show? While such a bid might well tions. You have to rely on your judgement.

N

♥ K9876 ♥

A Q 10 2

♦ K Q 10 7 5 4

W E

A92 ♦ be based on a strong hand, it could also be Watching on Bridge Base Online, I certain-

S

♣ AJ ♣

10 9 8 4 used to initiate a sacrifice (particularly at ly expected Malinowski to raise to 6♥. At

♠ A K Q 10 9 7 6 3 favourable vulnerability). Not inclined to any other vulnerability, he surely would

♥ Void gamble that West held a strong hand, Artur have done (because of the increased likeli-

♦ J8 hood that 4NT was constructive). There is

♣ Q73

Malinowski responded just 5♣.

West’s correction to 5♦ showed that he no easy solution to this bidding dilemma. If

West North East South held the red suits. What should Malinowski there was, the England stars would have

Sandqvist Saelesnminde Malinowski Svendsen do now? He has stronger support for a red known about it!

Pass 4♠ two-suiter and must have considered bid-

4NT Pass 5♣ Pass ding a slam. The main deterrent against I Awards: 7♥ – 10, 6♥ – 8, 6♦ – 7,

5♦ Pass 5♥ doing so is not the two spade losers. West is games – 3, 4♠ (South) - 1.

3. N/S Game. Dealer East. The deal comes from the semi-finals of the cards and indeed all three other East-West

2007 Spingold championship, contested in pairs did reach the poor slam. All credit to

♠ AJ732 ♠ KQ865 Nashville. Ao, therefore, who took note of the large

♥ A84 N ♥ 62 Wang’s 3♥ was a transfer bid and the number of losers in his hand. Realising also

W E

♦ AKJ S ♦ 10 6 4 3NT rebid, a break of the transfer, showed that five-card trump support is not particu-

♣ QJ ♣ A75 excellent spade support. If East wanted to larly valuable when you have no singleton

sign off now, he would bid 4♥ – a ‘re-trans- in your hand, he signed off. Well bid,

West East indeed! Justice was done when only one of

Ao Wang

fer’ to 4♠, so that the strong hand could

Pass play the contract. No, Wang could sniff a the minor-suit finesses was successful.

2NT 3♥ slam and cue-bid 4♣ instead. Many players

3NT 4♣ would now have bid a slam on the West I Awards: 4♠/3NT – 10, 5♠ – 6, 6♠ – 4.

4♠

14 English Bridge December 2007 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056