Page 0037

OCT_EB_p37.qxd 18/9/07 12:54 pm Page 37

From the floor: the August Debate

the debate. Like so many MANY years ago my analyses

Thank you all those who voted and sent in their bridge issues, there are many showed that it was preferable to

comments – too many to be all published! Michelle factors which help you find play a weak no-trump at pairs

Brunner wins the debate with 60% of the votes. the best bid – a good suit and Heather wins the argument

would lean you towards a suit here in arguing that an opening

I WILL not be voting on the no-trumps anyway, because of opening, whereas tenaces sug- 1NT should not include a five-

Brunner/Dhondy debate as they the scoring system. gest 1NT. card major.

are both right. Their articles Graham Hannaford, For those in doubt I find the However, it seems preferable

were, however, very helpful in Churchdown Bridge Club Losing Trick Count a good to play a strong no-trump

clarifying the issues involved, guide. A one-level suit-opening system at IMP scoring, and here

particularly Heather highlight- THAT the debate appears to be should contain no more than there is a much stronger case

ing the downside of Five-card unsettled after several decades seven losers but a weak no- for opening no-trump bids to

Stayman in response to 1NT. since its conception ought to trump usually has eight. include a five-card major and

Michelle admits she would lead you to conclude that the One small caveat: with a so Michelle gets my vote here.

open 1♥/1♠, not 1NT, with a net long-term benefit of either borderline decision you would So, if I am allowed two votes,

strong five-card major. Conver- method over the other is likely be more likely to open 1NT if it is for one to each!

sely (although she does not say to be immaterial. Hence, to list your five-card suit were hearts John Griffiths, Herts

so explicitly), I am sure Heather theoretical arguments for each rather than spades, for obvious

would open 1NT, not 1♥, with case and attempt to trade them pre-emptive reasons. MY vote goes to Heather, unless

♠AQ ♥107532 ♦KJ4 ♣QJ3, off is unlikely to be productive. Mike Pomfrey, by e-mail the five-card major is very

just like my first-year students Fortunately there is another weak, e.g. J-x-x-x-x), otherwise

would. The point at issue is approach available, which is to I AM with Michelle including you might miss an eight-card

surely how good, or bad, the analyse statistically the results her exceptions. I have experi- fit (or longer), which usually

five-card major has to be before achieved by each policy based mented with opening 1NT all plays better giving possible

you change from one opening on historical results. An attempt balanced hands with 12-14 ruffs in the short-trump hand

bid to the other. at this was undertaken almost HCP but was uncomfortable and reducing the risk of the

My personal guideline is that exactly a year ago by Ben Dick- doing so when a high percent- defenders attacking a weak,

if my five-card major is suffi- ens using ‘BridgeBrowser’, the age of the points were in the short side-suit in no-trumps.

ciently good that I would be analytical tool developed by five-card major. Wallace Curtis,

happy to play with it as trumps Stephen Pickett. For those with Mike Bennett, by e-mail London N12

opposite three small cards, I access, the link to his report is

will open 1♥/1♠; if not, 1NT. here: http://forums.bridgebase.

Philip Wraight, Staveley com/index.php?showtopic=152 2007 National County League Finals

52&view=findpost&p=148143

THE August issue mentioned Dickens examined 52 million

that the majority of EBU mem- hands played on-line, focused

bers play pairs at their club, but on about 170,000 that matched

your columnists seem to aim his criteria for a borderline

their articles at Teams play 1Major/1NT opener, and exam-

– a totally different game. ined both the overall IMP and

Hence the Debate, like most MP gain v loss of each strategy.

other ‘stuff’ in English Bridge, At either form of scoring the

has only a passing interest, e.g. results suggest that there is a net

get your games right at all costs gain to be had by opening 1NT,

Photo: Graham Jepson

from Heather Dhondy, whereas but the benefit is small.

the bread and butter hands win For a given partnership the

or lose tournaments. outcome is more likely to dep-

I frequently open 1NT with a end on subjective issues. Some

five-card major to give my partnerships may perform

partner a point range early in better by opening 1NT when

the auction. The pairs game is others may perform better by MICKLEOVER Court Hotel, Derby, was the venue for the first

heavily weighted to making opening the major. It just boils National County League Finals, organised by Graham Jepson

one more trick as declarer, and down to what falls into your of Yorkshire. The five bridge areas of the country (North,

Midlands, South-West, East and Metropolitan) were represented

lack of information by the op- comfort zone.

at three levels by county teams of eight who had won their

ponents often leads to poor Tim Ackers, Gloucester respective championships. The winners were Leicestershire

defence – particularly on the (Section A, in the picture), Berks & Bucks (Section B),

opening lead. EACH of your learned ladies and Warwickshire (Section C).

Most hands are played in has some right on her side in

www.ebu.co.uk October 2007 English Bridge 37

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048