Page 0053


June 2019 English Bridge

session break, how you want other tables' scores to

be shown, etc. You can also specify random deals or

you can import hands from a range of different file

types. So, in a as little as a couple of minutes your

event is ready to start. This would be a boon to a

busy club like mine as the workload of having

boards pre-prepared and then setting up and

scoring an event can be quite onerous.

During events you can display running scores if

you wish so at the end the result is immediately

available and will be able to be uploaded to the EBU

and/or Bridgewebs. The programs to run events are

comprehensive and allows pairs events with matchpoint or IMP scoring;

Teams, Swiss pairs and Swiss

teams. 'Social Games' covers individual events,

Chicago and single table games

Then you have the other use for the system -

teaching. You can construct lessons by importing

boards and annotating them with teacher's notes

that will show on the tablet at the appropriate time.

During the lesson you can send the same board to

each table and then follow how they bid and review

how the hand was played.


The concept is wonderful! And the

implementation is mostly pretty good. However,

there are a few things that either haven't been fully

thought through or have been designed to suit

bridge playing in Scandinavia (they are designed

and made in Denmark) where they seem to go

about their bridge in quite a different way to the

UK. There are parts of the system where you can't

help thinking, 'Why did they bother to implement

this? We would never use it.'. But I guess they do use

these features elsewhere. Then there are other things

that don't work too well at the moment - like

entering the players on the tablets at the start of an

event which seems rather cumbersome. However,

the developers are very open to suggestions and

prepared to make changes to suit the way we do

things so I am hopeful that there will soon be

changes here.

The teams movements are designed for an even

number of teams so that each round consists of

matches between two teams. With an odd number

of teams the only option is for one team to sit out a

round. This might be fine if you have 13 teams

playing 12 2-board matches, but with only five

teams you would have a team sitting out for each

round of six boards. I'm sure this would not go

down well with our members. Again the developers

intend to provide an alternative movement for odd

numbers of teams but this can only be done by not

playing the same board simultaneously at all tables.

The dealer seems well made and durable. The

tablets might not be as reliable. My personal

experience is that four years is about average. One

thing to bear in mind is that both the dealers and

the tablets have rechargeable batteries so you will

need facilities for that. The dealers should run for at

least 10 hours on a charge but the tablets may last

no more than five or six hours.

So the conclusion is that it certainly is good now

- but it will get even better in the future as

improvements are made to the software.


It's not cheap. For each table you need a dealer

and a tablet which have a list price of £700 plus VAT.

On this basis it can be quite cost-effective for

smaller clubs or to have one at home for your

friendly bridge sessions with friends. If you

compare the cost against a dealing machine and

Bridgemate-type devices at the table then it can be

cheaper for up to five or six tables but for a 16-table

club it probably costs twice as much. On top of that,

there is an annual fee of 10% of the list price to

cover support and the use of the cloud-based server

(the first two years are free). The cards themselves

are also quite expensive. They are made of plastic so

should have a considerably longer life than normal

cards and time will tell if they last five times as long

to compensate for the extra cost. The feel of the

cards produced different reactions from players;

some liked them but others found them quite slippy

and not that easy to hold (I guess that is needed to

deal them easily).

Is it worth the cost? In my opinion it certainly is

- if you can afford it. You need to assess the benefit

of an enhanced bridge experience and the reduction

in workload preparing and running an event.

The EBU used Bridge+More units for the Two

Stars Pairs finals a couple of years ago. They were

ideally suited as the finals are barometer. The

hardware was well-designed and players found it

intuitive to use. We are not planning to use them

in future EBU events, in part because of the cost

but also because they require their own software

and we run many unique events for which we have

developed software. Gordon Rainsford, Chief TD


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072
  73. Page 0073
  74. Page 0074