Page 0033

More NGS Silly Game! Bali, Here LETTERS TO THE

Concerns Playing a duplicate session at We Come! EDITOR

Leeds Bridge Club, this was our

I CONSIDER it unsatisfactory last board of the evening: INSPIRED by the article in

that you have responded ‘That’s English Bridge on the forth-

not correct. The documenta- N/S Game. Dealer East. coming European Champion- Send your letters to the

tion online states . . .’ to the ´ K6 ships in Dublin, a friend and I Editor,

member who wrote (June ™ 32 decided to travel to Ireland to Elena Jeronimidis, 23 Erleigh

t 75 Road, Reading RG1 5LR, or e?

2012) complaining that playing experience a big international mail

® AQ98742

with a weaker partner adversely event, and to lend our support (please include your postal

´ Q9872 ´ J 10 4 3 address)

affected his grade. I believe ™ A Q 10 7 4 ™ J985

to the England teams.

The editor reserves the right

there is truth in this member’s t KJ N t Q9863 With 72 teams from 34


assertion. I have played twelve ®3 S

® Void different countries taking part,

times in the past year with ´ A5 all smartly attired in their

players 6-7 grades beneath my

own, and have beaten par on

™ K6

t A 10 4 2

national colours (well, nearly

all), there was a real feeling of


only three occasions, and in- ® K J 10 6 5 entente cordiale, with the woes IN a recent duplicate, scored

curred an average shortfall per of the European debt crisis far by cross-imps rather than

session of 2.25% against par. Can you guess the contract from everyone’s mind. match-points, our already good

While top grades must fairly played? It was exciting to rub score was inflated by 26/24

accurately reflect the number The bidding went: shoulders with the Fantonis, due to a sit-out round. We

of mistakes one makes, when Bocchis, and Helgemos of this gained nearly 3 IMPs on each

two lower-graded players play West North East South world, as well as to be able to unplayed board, which looked

in partnership, some of their Pass 1® discuss the bridge with generous. Almost everything

mistakes cancel each other 2® All Pass English, Welsh and Scottish had gone our way, and the

out. A grade King playing with players and officials, particu- adjustment factor seemed to

a grade 5 benefits very little 1® was alerted and explained as larly David Burn and Simon be saying that our good luck

from ‘cancelling errors’, so that being as few as two clubs since Cochemé. would have continued, but

in a grade 6 duplicate their they were playing five-card We spent our time in both surely some regression to the

assumed pair grade of 9 majors. 2® meant at least 5-5 in the Vu-Graph Room, with mean should be allowed for.

overrates them against the field. the majors. As East, because I Barry Rigal and fellow com- Also, each board is worth the

The NGS Committee has held 4-4 in the majors, no clubs mentators’ incisive analysis of same at MPs, but at IMPs

done so much excellent work and South might be short of the hands, interspersed with some generate bigger swings

in devising and implementing clubs, I thought that 2® was their good-humoured banter; than others. Why should a pair

the scheme; surely it would be natural, and passed. So we and in the Open Room, where gain or lose (say) 3 IMPs by

within their capability to test ended up playing in 2 ® with four spectators only were not playing a board where

this scientifically, by surveying only one club between us! allowed to sit around a table of there is no scope for a swing?

results achieved by partner- The result was five down, their choice, and witness the Perhaps the adjustment

ships whose grades differ by, minus 250. bridge at close quarters. When factor should depend on the

say, 5 or more. Incredibly, this was an exact England made a brilliant play, type of scoring. In many cases,

Mike Griffiths, 50%; some N/S made 5®; it was difficult not to stand up changing the method applied

Paddock Wood nobody played in 3NT. with a triumphant fist-pump! would not affect the result (the

What a stupid game . . . The organisation by the Irish pair who finished just behind

Jeremy Dhondy replies: If you play Peter Doerfler, Leeds Bridge Union, who took on us also had a sit-out), but I

in a scratch partnership then the task at only three month’s wonder whether the EBU or

whether the player is better or Oh dear! Thinking that partner has notice when Greece pulled out, the world bridge authorities

worse than you there is clearly made a mistake or forgotten the was first class, and, together have looked at the apparent

room for misunderstanding during system never wins the post-mortem! with their traditional hospi- anomaly. By the way, I do like

the session and results may not be tality, we had a really wonder- cross-imp duplicate scoring,

as good as with a regular partner. If ful time. which is very popular at my

you play with a player several June Debate With the Open and Women’s club. The arguments for cross-

grades below you then the percent- teams both qualifying for the imps are well put by Gordon

age required for your grade to be ANDREW Robson just wins World Champion ship next Rainsford in the latest Tourna-

maintained or improved is lower the argument due to the in- year, it just remains to start ment Focus – always a good

than it would be with a higher- creased opportunity re: fre- planning our trip to Bali . . . read – on the EBU website.

ranked partner. To play twelve ses- quency. Could have done with Chris Bickerdike, Cornwall David Hull, London r

sions and incur a ‘shortfall’ is not perhaps more discussion as to

any more surprising than tossing a whether singleton ace should THE JUNE DEBATE – Thank you for your votes and comments.

coin twelve times and finding it be treated as a special case. The majority was in favour of Splintering on a singleton honour.

came down heads seven times. Bill March, by email August 2012 English Bridge 33


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056