Page 0019

Teams Tactics by Derek Patterson

Penalty Doubles of Game Contracts Part I

CLEARLY, BEFORE even considering a Accordingly, West has to work out reward ratio greatly favours a double by

penalty double, there has to be a reason- which suit to lead. In this and similar East, whereas, at pairs, this is not so clear.

able chance of defeating the opponents’ situations, having discounted the suits Consequently, in many situations when

contract. Extreme caution should be where North-South are known to have considering whether to double a game

exercised when doubling part-scores, strong holdings, the obvious selection will contract, at teams you should be prepared

because of the danger of doubling the be West’s weakest suit, although further to take slight risks whereas, playing pairs,

opponents into game. You should adopt a inferences may exist. On this basis, with a more cautious approach is sensible.

more aggressive approach to doubling game reference to the full deal below, West Returning to the featured hand, there

contracts. seems to have two equally reasonable are some other issues that should be

Furthermore, if playing pairs, an un- leads, the t8 and ®7: noted. One is that some players would

successful double might turn an average play a double of 2t as being lead-

into a bottom but, at teams, turning -620 directing. In this case, East would be

into -790 will cost just 5 IMPs. So, in many E/W Game. Dealer South. extremely hopeful of West finding a club

such circumstances, the risks involved are ´ KQ lead by passing over 2t, thereby denying a

smaller in teams than in pairs. To illustrate ™ KJ864 strong diamond holding and then

the point, consider this deal. Imagine that t Q94 doubling 3NT. In this scenario, a double of

you are East with the following hand, ® Q96 3NT would be clear at both teams and

taken from a recent tournament: ´ 10 9 7 5 4 ´ 82 pairs. For those who play a double of 2t

™ Q 10 7 2 N ™ 93 as showing a strong hand, the above

W E

´ 82 You are vulnerable, the t 83 S t A 10 6 5 inference would not be available and

™ 93 opponents are not, and ® 75 ® A K J 10 4 doubling 3NT would be clear at teams but

t A 10 6 5 the auction begins thus: ´ AJ63 not so obvious at pairs.

® A K J 10 4 ™ A5 A second point is that East could have

t KJ72 pinpointed the club lead by overcalling 3®

® 832 on the first round. The problem with this

West North East South action is that it is not sound, and risks

1NT1 being doubled for a sizeable penalty. The

Pass 2t2 Pass 2™ On a club lead 3NT is doomed but on any prevailing vulnerability and the lack of a

Pass 3NT3 ? other lead declarer can prevail, making sixth club suggests that pass is correct.

1 12-14 two diamond tricks, four spades and three Furthermore, it should be noted that

2 Transfer to hearts. hearts. So, the double does carry some risk sometimes, this sort of double is used to

3 Giving opener a choice of games. – the main problem being that partner announce a strong holding in dummy’s

might not discern that clubs is the suit to long suit (hearts). On this occasion, how-

What now? A lot depends on whether you lead. A further, albeit lesser, problem is ever, East can be confident that if 3NT is

are playing pairs or teams. that occasionally, despite West finding a passed by South, then West will have

At most tables East passed again, as did club lead, declarer might still succeed (on enough hearts to know that this cannot be

South and when West led a spade, declarer a different layout), with the clubs being the reason for the double.

made the contract. Some Easts doubled, stopped and declarer being able to cash at In addition, South might remove to 4™.

however! It doesn’t make sense for this least eight major-suit tricks before surren- In this case, the double will help West to

‘out of the blue’ double to show a lot of dering the lead. find the best lead against that contract as

points – East had the opportunity to bid What effect would the format (pairs or well.

earlier, chose not to and, furthermore, the teams) have on East’s decision to double? With regard to the doubling of game

opponents have advertised the values for The main issue here is that playing contracts, there are situations (which I

game already. pairs, 3NT doubled going down will be a intend to explore in the next article) calling

A more intelligent interpretation is that top but making will be a bottom. At teams, for more caution at teams than pairs. Ex-

East is making a lead-directing double. if it makes, then 4 IMPs will have been cepting these, however, and without advo-

The idea is that if West can be persuaded sacrificed, whereas if it goes down, the cating a style of reckless penalty doubles,

to lead the right suit, in this case clubs, double will have gained 12 IMPs in com- the following advice seems reasonable: At

then 3NT should fail. The message is: parison with not doubling and partner teams, be that bit readier to double game

‘Please lead my suit, not yours!’ leading a spade. Playing teams, the risk- contracts than you might be at pairs. r

www.ebu.co.uk June 2012 English Bridge 19

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056