Page 0034

LETTERS CONTINUED from page 33

The Debate Luck

I SIDE with Tom Townsend WITH regard to the letter in

because he gives full weight to the April magazine headed ‘No

A Problem for Alan Mould the simple overcall – such as

Byrne’s Hand A. Weak Jump

Tweaking’, I can supply a real-

life example of the vagaries of

I ENJOYED Tom Townsend’s auction and our lead? Overcalls have the failing the scoring system.

report of the Premier League We know nothing of declarer’s common to all pre-emptive Some years ago my partner

(February issue). On the second hand but we do know that he bids: if you don’t win the and I were sitting N/S at a

hand, Crouch-Patterson got to chose not to relay for shortage but contract, your hand is an open twenty-table club duplicate.

seems to have been sufficiently

6t after Patterson had opened book. An IJO is a constructive When the last board was

pleased to hear a 4® cue-bid that

1´ (Precision) and shown 5-5 he Blackwooded his way to slam. bid, made on opening bid played, it was passed out. On

in spades and diamonds with This suggests that he was worried values and a decent six- or looking at the traveller every

two aces. Crouch had just used about clubs (possibly with two seven-card suit – if you make a E/W pair had bid to a contract

a series of asking bids to plus losers) whereas he wasn’t simple overcall instead, you which in every case had failed

establish this, so Graham worried about hearts. On the tell your partner that you lack to make. So as a result we had

Osborne had a ‘blind lead’ other hand partner had two these – either one or both of a bottom which we could do

from: opportunities to double club bids them – and may simply be nothing about!

´8 6 ™8 6 5 3 t10 ®K 9 8 7 6 3 and chose not to. But would

indicating a suitable lead; if This I feel is an example of

partner necessarily double with,

Osborne led a heart and now say, ®Q? We are also sure that

partner is strong, you are not how luck in its various forms

the contract could make. partner has one key card. pre-empting him. plays a significant part in the

Suppose Alan Mould had set Having examined the auction Michael Byrne’s very last game. Without the ‘Bridge

the East hand as one of his for any inferences, what about our ex am ple: Gods’ on your side, we mere

lead problems; what marks hand? ´K 2 ™K 4 3 t4 3 ®A Q J 9 6 4 mortals will not achieve good

would he have given to these It is generally wrong to lead suggests he requires a lot of scores. However, there are

choices: ™6, ´6, ®7, ®K? trumps against small slams and points for a two-level overcall; players who seem to defy this

Keith George, by email the singleton trump has no surely one would make it and do consistently well any-

appeal. Similarly I would discard a

spade lead as being at best passive

without the king of spades? way.

Alan Mould replies: Relay systems The IJO looks a good route to Harold Grouse, Hucclecote

and possibly deadly for the

have their positive and negative defence. A heart is possible but 3NT to me!

features, but there is no doubt, needs partner to have a lot in the Fleur Waters, by email

however, that knowing nothing

at all about one hand makes the

suit for it to be correct. Plus

declarer definitely has a control in

NGS

I HAVE been playing bridge

opening lead much more difficult,

and if the relayer happens to be

the suit and you may well be

leading into strength (as indeed

(at various standards) for over Concerns

declarer the subsequent defence fifty years. I started off playing

you were!). It is generally good

as well. However, there are often Intermediate Jump Overcalls I PLAY regularly with three

practice to lead aggressively

clues available from the auction against small slams and normally and for 35 years . . . I never different strong partners. We

which Derek Patterson has kindly a club would be indicated. If the bid! Now I play Weak Jump play competitively and do

supplied to me with annotations: inference that declarer was Overcalls 4-9 points depend- pretty well. I also play with

worried about clubs is taken, then ing on the vulnerability and I a fourth partner with whom I

Patterson Crouch a club is more indicated. On the am bidding at every session I have played for many years.

1´1 2®2 other hand having six clubs is bad play in! (A slight exaggeration, This partner is now elderly and

2NT3 3t4 news as you need the other clubs I admit.) no longer plays as well as in the

4®5 4™6 to break 3-2-2 around the table to

But the point I am making past. We enjoy our bridge game

5®7 6t have a trick and partner needs the

queen. Nevertheless. I think the is obvious . . . Frequency! but we are invariably near the

1 Five-card major, limited to 15 club has it, so I would mark Mr For Tom Townsend to quote bottom of the results table. I

points (we open light often) George’s suggested leads as: successes using Intermediate have no intention of breaking

2 Artificial; forcing to game, ™6: 5 Marks. It could be right but Jump Overcalls is well and this partnership.

usually either (i) balanced(ish) there are better leads available. good – there is always going to However, under the NGS, if

or (ii) a long minor ´6: 2 Marks. Way too passive. be the exception to the rule. But I am interested in attaining a

3 5+ spades and 5+ diamonds. ®7: 10 Marks. The best lead. You to have success you need high rating I would have to

4 Natural, but Peter could have need two tricks and a club is the opportunity, and frequency drop my fourth partner.

bid 3® as a further relay most likely lead to set one of them dictates that there is more Name and address supplied

which would have asked for up. opportunity for success using

shortage and then bid RKCB ®K: 8 Marks. It probably isn’t

Weak Jump Overcalls than That’s not correct. The documenta-

over that going to do any harm, but is, I

5 think, inferior to the pedestrian

Intermediate Jump Overcalls. tion online states that a strong player

Cue-bid (co-operating in a

slam exploration) low club. It is dummy that has the Any failures, I must add, who plays with a weaker player

6 RKCB for diamonds club control and declarer is un- might be the result of abusing automatically benefits from a lower

7 2 Key cards but not the queen likely to have one. the system or the rock of dis- ‘target score’ for the boards he plays

of diamonds I would emphasise that these are tribution. with that player. See also page 29 for

So what are we to make of the my views and others may disagree! Raymond Semp, Manchester answers to some NGS FAQs. r

34 English Bridge June 2012 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056