Page 0021

Teams Tactics by Derek Patterson

When in Doubt, Bid Game!

TO BID or not to bid (game), that is the Some will make and some will fail but in

question. Of course, each situation will As a consequence, experts try to bid the long run, the aggressive approach

have its own set of circumstances upon all marginal vulnerable games, should turn out to be a winner, even if

which any decision will depend. However, choosing to play in part-scores only only 40% of such contracts succeed.

when playing teams, adopting an when game contracts appear to be

optimistic approach to the bidding of completely unrealistic propositions.

game contracts is likely to be a successful In passing, it is probably sensible to

strategy. It is a matter of risk and reward. note that the strategy of optimistic

For example, imagine that you are North, When non-vulnerable, the risk-reward ratio bidding should not be applied to

with the hand below: is closer but, even so, a mildly aggressive slam-bidding, for which a cautious

approach is still correct. approach is suitable.

On this occasion, bidding game turned

´ QJ852 and, with everybody out to be a successful choice:

™ K83 vulnerable, the follow- From the Defenders' Perspective

t 862 ing auction develops:

® 65 Game All. Dealer East. When playing a teams match, having to

´ QJ852 play against a pair that seems to be in

™ K83 game on every hand is not easy. One

West North East South t 862 unlucky lead, one momentary lapse in

1® 1NT1 ® 65 concentration, and before you know it

Pass 2™2 Pass 3´3 ´ 97 ´ K3 declarer has claimed his or her contract. A

Pass ? ™ 9652 N ™ AJ4 constant barrage of thin games tends to

W E

1 15-17 points t A9753 S t J 10 apply considerable pressure and, being

2 Transfer to spades ® J7 ® K 10 8 4 3 2 human, most of us yield at some point.

3 Showing four-card spade support and a ´ A 10 6 4 Therefore, the idea should be to exert

maximum ™ Q 10 7 (in the nicest possible way!) the same type

t KQ4 of pressure on your opponents when the

What now? ® AQ9 opportunity arises – stay out of hopeless

Playing in a duplicate pairs event, it is games but be prepared to bid all the close

sensible to take no further action. The ones.

point is that both 3NT and 4´ rate to fail When West led the ®J (partner's suit) In the first article of the series, I

reasonably often and going down is likely against 4´, a third-round club ruff pro- advocated the habit of playing safely for

to be just as bad as making game would be vided access to the dummy and despite the contract. So now, the two major

good. However, when this deal occurred in the tA being offside, the ´K, ™J and ®K ingredients of successful teams play have

a top international teams event, the were all successfully finessed (dummy's been covered – bold bidding in the game

players were contemplating which game to trumps serving as subsequent entries) to zone, followed by careful play to secure the

bid, rather than whether to bid one. enable the contract to be made. On other (potentially precarious) contract.

The reason for this is that 4´ making leads, the play is more complicated but

gains 10 IMPs by comparison with 3´ plus declarer can prevail by exiting in dia- Final Thought

one. On the other hand, 4´ minus one monds (or a heart to the king) and forcing

loses 6 IMPS by comparison with 3´ the opponents to broach the critical suits. A friend of mine once told the tale of a

making. The reward for bidding game is a Meanwhile, 3NT was made when West fellow bridge player who ‘gets a nose-bleed

gain of 10 IMPs, the risk is a loss of 6 decided to lead a diamond (the ®J lead when the bidding reaches the three-level.’

IMPs. Naturally, the prospect of over- would have defeated the contract) and the ‘No good at teams!’ he added . . . r

bidding slightly and then being doubled diamonds were blocked. The successful

adds to the risk but this is offset by yet declarers were fortunate to varying extents

When you have finished

another factor: that, occasionally, the but this is a situation where good players

reading this magazine,

defenders will give tricks away, especially earn their own luck.

please recycle it.

with the opening lead. So be prepared to bid marginal games.

www.ebu.co.uk February 2012 English Bridge 21

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056