Page 0040

The Debate Chris Jagger

Landy is Better Than Astro

Two top players debate a hot bridge topic. Tell us whose argument has won you over by e-mailing elena@ebu.co.uk

OPPONENTS OPEN 1NT, and you bid 2® come in on the sort of filth I come in on, response if partner bids it. Works much

to show the majors. Partner can pick a the last thing you want to do is push better, doesn’t it?

major, or bid 2t to get you to bid your partner to the three level. Well, what happens if opponents com-

better major. Great – it’s just like playing pete? Are you going to volunteer 3™ and

Stayman over opponents’ 1NT opening, It is Easier to Be Doubled hope there is a fit somewhere, or keep quiet

but we call it Landy. Why do we play and miss a potentially huge fit as you have

Stayman over our no-trump? Because If you overcall 2™, opponents have a simple never shown your longest suit?

majors are really important when bidding choice: they either double you or they What happens if they don’t compete?

constructively. Why should we play Landy don’t. True, you may be in a grotty fit – in This is even worse! Imagine responder has

over the opponents’ no-trump? Because fact you may be in the opponents’ fit, but a 3-1-4-5 hand. If he bids 2™, then partner

majors are still pretty damn important they haven’t doubled you yet. With Astro may well pass and play in a gruesome fit,

when competing! And whenever you have there is much more chance for opponents while if he bids 2´ partner may actually

bid 2®, partner is in a hugely powerful to get their act together: they can consult have four spades and a longer minor. There

position: he knows both your suits in one each other, by passing then doubling, seems to be a lot of guesswork – I thought

fell swoop – now that must be worth doubling then doubling, doubling then that was what we wanted opponents to be

something. passing – about three times as many doing?

Sounds hard to believe that anyone options as over a direct overcall.

would play anything else, doesn’t it? But Conclusion

you know, some people have come up with How Do you Find Your Fit?

other dastardly conventions – in fact think- I don’t have answers to all these questions –

ing up defences to 1NT is almost a national This is one that even Astro enthusiasts lose but fortunately I don’t need them! Keep it

pastime. When I was a lad, people were sleep over: it is great when partner wades in simple, have as many natural bids as you

playing all sorts of defences against pre- and you have four card support, but for can, but make sure you have a way to show

empts, while nowadays pretty much every- those realists among us, we know that just both majors. A hand to prove the point

one just plays the simplest thing – take-out ain’t going to happen! makes sense.

doubles – which also happens to be best. I You hold a 4-5-2-2 shape hand, and I

suspect in years to come the same will be have a 4-2-3-4 shape. You bid 2® to show

true of defending against a 1NT opening. hearts and another suit. I bid 2t. Now N/S Game. Dealer South.

So what’s wrong with Astro? Roughly 69 what? Do you bid 2´ and hope I don’t have ´ 54

things, of which my esteemed editor has a 2-2-4-5 shape? Or bid 2™ and miss the ™ 10 4

confined me to mentioning just a few. spade fit? If you choose 2™, am I meant to t A K Q 10 3

go on in the hope of finding a fit? Will I get ® Q 10 9 7

The Loss of the Natural 2t Bid into deeper trouble by bidding, or miss a fit ´ KQ83 ´ J 10 9 6 2

by passing? This is a boring, everyday hand ™ QJ952 N ™ AK7

W E

Catastrophe! Particularly as when you type, but I have no idea what to do! t 6 S t 8752

come in with 2t over 1NT the opponents Suppose instead I have a 4-2-2-5 shape. Is ® 643 ® 8

have two possible major-suit fits to find, partner meant to pass 2t with five hearts ´ A7

which is so much harder than dealing with and four diamonds, leaving me in a 4-2 fit ™ 863

a two-of-a-major overcall, where there is (and look who’s going to end up playing t J94

only one. this delightful contract!). Or does he bid ® AKJ52

2™, and finds I actually had a 4-2-4-3

You Never Play in Two-of-a-minor shape, and 2t was much better?

Both tables started 1NT – (2®) – 3NT. At

Great bit of kit Astro may be, but you rarely Anchoring to the Shorter Major one table 2® was Landy, and West heard 4´

get to play in a minor at the two level – it is from East, which was doubled and made.

all very well with spades and clubs to Some people sneakily play the methods the At the other, 2t was selected to show

venture in with 2t, but sadly you have other way round. With a 4-5-2-2 shape they spades and another; East passed and West

bypassed 2®. And if you are aiming to bid 2t to show spades, and then pass a 2™ led a spade – eleven tricks made! r

40 English Bridge February 2012 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056