Page 0019

OCT_08_EB_p19 Letters 12/9/08 12:02 pm Page 19

Plain speaking Green LETTERS TO THE

WILL someone please tell me the conservative, classical pre- Values EDITOR

who (Marc Smith or Frances empt meaning: ‘I expect to go

Hinden) was arguing in favour 2/3 off in this contract.’ This is HAVING returned to compe-

of or against disciplined or delightfully disciplined and titive bridge after a break of

random pre-empts ? random at the same time. No almost twenty years, I found

For example, Marc Smith lies, no deceptions, it does ex- that I had accumulated over Send your letters to the Editor,

concludes: ‘You should be disci- actly what it says on the tin. 150 Green Points – my collec- Elena Jeronimidis, 23 Erleigh Road,

plined within the confines of But should I be surprised at tion of GPs being gained via Reading RG1 5LR, or e-mail

your agreed system.’ I’m sorry, the advocates’ comments, be- events such as Crockfords, Gold

I thought he was advocating cause when reading about the Cup, and National Pairs. The editor reserves the right to condense

letters. Publication does not mean the

random pre-empts. However, bidding methods of experts one Having recently entered a few EBU agrees with the views expressed or

Frances Hinden argues: ‘. . . the is very much aware of their Sim Pairs events, I was surpri- that the comments are factually correct.

disciplined player loosens up over-egging of the pudding and sed to learn that GPs can now

in other positions.’ And there I their quest for the latest fa- be obtained by playing against

was thinking she was advoca-

ting disciplined pre-empts.

shionable bidding gizmo?

David Richardson,

players of limited ability.

Why did the EBU change

Thank you

Accuse me of taking things

out of context if you must, but

Boston Spa the previous practice of only

issuing black points? kindly!

I’m just an old fashioned GOM I hope this month’s debate Do other members feel that

(grumpy old man). The only (pages 38-39) attracts more by awarding Green Points in I HAVE just spent a pleasant

thing that made sense was votes than the two (a 50-50 Sim Pairs, promotion through morning reading the August

Frances Hinden’s reference to split) I received for August! the master-point ranks is made magazine. I felt I had to drop

easier and therefore GPs have you a mail to say what a good

lost some of their merit? read it was this time.

Card problems Mel Downing, by e-mail I love the snippets of news

you slotted in everywhere. The

WHEN the new design cards eyesight problem which ex- Alan Nelson, Chairman of the one of Bill Gardner was bril-

were introduced at Brighton a acerbated the problem. Tournament Committee, replies: liant. I have met Bill all around

few years ago, there were some I hope that this problem can ‘Our objective in making this the circuit over the years and

problems with the confusion be examined and corrected change was to encourage play- have missed him recently pro-

caused by the design of the ace when the next batch of playing ers of all levels of ability by re- bably due to his mayoral duties.

of spades. cards are manufactured. cognising excellent performance There was the lovely story of

The problem arose again on Peter J. Bates, Sussex in a national event even if it was him in Luxor where he went

Sunday for one of our oppo- in the familiar environment of and bartered for a job lot of

nents who mistook declarer’s Jeremy Dhondy informs me that their local club. Our hope is Egyptian cotton t-shirts in

lead of the ace of spades as the the new cards are clearer in this that that this will in turn en- every colour imaginable. I don’t

ace of clubs and consequently respect, and says the solution, courage more players to value think the seller knew what hit

revoked, failing to follow suit. if clubs can afford it, is to replace the EBU Tournament and him. Bill still wears them at the

In this case the player had an the old ones sooner rather later. Master-point programmes.’ events he attends!

If you can keep the size of

issue like this one, I am sure

Part-scores Teams v Pairs revisited people will be happy to have a

thinner type of paper to keep

WHY does the bidding test I AGREE with Guy Malcolm The disproportionate effect the postage the same.

contain so many slam hands (August Letters) that team style of big swings can be eliminated Jenny Gray, by e-mail

every issue? They only form a and scoring is attractive, esp- if the session is scored using

small part of day-to-day bridge. ecially in a ‘proper’ team event, board-a-match instead of IMPs. The number of letters and e-

Can’t we have more part-scores where one team of four plays But that requires pairs-style tac- mails received in praise of the

and games to test ourselves on? another over 24 or 32 boards. A tics, not teams, defeating the in- August issue has been heart-

Dick Clark, by e-mail club team evening is different. itial reason for having a teams warming! Thank you all who

Most likely each team will play evening! wrote in. I am happy to report

David Bird points out that part- just two boards against 12 other I like teams, but do not dis- that English Bridge will go up

score hands of interest usually teams. IMPs scoring skews the miss pairs. I enjoy trying for to a regular 64 pages in Decem-

entail contested auctions, which ranking in favour of a team that something, losing 1700 but ber, after the stock of heavier

the Questions sheet does not cope gets one enormous score, often realising that has only cost our paper that the printers had set

well with. He is, however, happy not through its own efforts but pair 4%, at pairs, rather than aside for us has been used up. As

to comply with readers’ wishes because one of its pairs was ruining the result for a whole for the news sprinkled all over

and will, in future, look harder lucky to be playing a pair that team. the mag, well . . . we depend on

for interesting non-slam hands. gave away a stupid 1700 points. Barry North, Cobham you for that! October 2008 English Bridge 19


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056