Page 0071

North: (20) I disagree. 3NT may still be a make, if

South has a different type of hand. (21) And if he

hasn't, 3t will be safer than 2NT.

West: (22) That's all very well, but how is the

wretched South to tell?

South: (23) Of course, I should have been able to

tell. North is quite right.

East: (24) Perhaps I should have bid a 1´ over

North's 1t. It would have helped West with his

defence.

South: I daresay West needs all the help he can get,

(25) but you'd still have got a pretty poor result

on the hand.

POST MORTEM ANSWERS

(1), (2), (3) & (4). East's contention is perfectly

valid. The opponents' bidding has been pretty

revealing. North's opening is substantially based on

length in diamonds and South, in spite of the

warning issued by his partner's bid of 3t, has made

a gambling try for game. Unless there are nine tricks

on top, which is unlikely, he will only succeed if he

can establish either diamonds or clubs. East knows

the diamonds to be stacked, and from his singleton

in the suit has good reason to suppose that the clubs

are too. The contract will therefore probably fail and

may flop very badly, but only provided the play

takes its normal course and the declarer is not

actively assisted to set up one of his long suits.

North's remark (3) is very much to the point in this

connection; he is known by West to have very

considerable length in diamonds and, since he

opened the bidding, to be not entirely lacking in

entry cards. West is fortunate in that he has a

perfectly safe lead in the ™Q, and even if the suit

cannot be established through lack of entries, the

threat of its establishment may well embarrass the

declarer.

In contrast to the 'Lightner' double of a slam

contract, a double of 3NT is never an absolute

command to lead a suit bid by dummy. If during a

somewhat complex round of bidding, the player

who subsequently becomes dummy has bid one or

more suits and has not been supported by his

partner, a double is obviously a strong suggestion to

the defender on lead that an attack on one of these

suits will provide the most hopeful line of defence,

but it cannot be generalised into an invariable rule

and must be considered in the light of all the

circumstances of the individual hand.

(1) A. (2) B. (3) A. (4) A.

(5) A. If East had doubled 3t, West would have

had a stronger case for leading the suit. As it was, the

absence of such a double is an additional reason for

not doing so.

(6) & (7). Intelligent, as opposed to purely double

dummy, defence does break the contract. If East

plays the heart deuce, he indicates that from his

angle there is no future in the suit. West, knowing

that declarer has the ace and king and that he

himself is entryless, should also realise that there is

no future in hearts, and should switch.

(6) B & 7 (A).

(8) B. This is quite preposterous. Suit Preference

Signals only apply in the most obvious cases and

should never be permitted to interfere with normal

signalling methods. East's play of the heart deuce

does no more than suggest the abandonment of

hearts and a switch to West's most natural lead.

Quite clearly this should be spades, both because

East probably has substantial values in the suit and

because the removal of an entry card from dummy

is patently desirable.

(9) & (10). Even if South is known to be addicted

to the practice of bidding a suit with the object of

inhibiting its lead at no trumps it is unlikely that he

would have taken the dangerous course of doing so

on the first round. Moreover, if he has neither clubs

nor diamonds he must have length in spades, and it

would indeed be odd if he never attempted what,

for all he knows, may be a lay-down major suit

game. The fact that such a remark should have been

made by South is illustrative of how the mere

reputation of certain players for 'clever' bidding can

be exploited to induce quite irrational fears in the

minds of the opponents.

(9) B & (10) A.

(11) A. A switch to the ®J would not be bad, in

that the contract can still be defeated and an attack

in a no trump contract on a doubleton honour,

especially when the dummy includes two

doubletons, is well known to experienced players to

tend to disrupt declarer's communications, even

though the suit itself cannot be established. The

spade switch is, nevertheless, much to be preferred,

since, if East's jack is transposed with one of South's

small spades, it alone will prevent East being endplayed

on spades and the contract being made. 71

August 2018 English Bridge

www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072
  73. Page 0073
  74. Page 0074
  75. Page 0075
  76. Page 0076