Page 0073

everything in sight in 1937. Whilst Maurice

Harrison-Gray and S J (Skid) Simon were perhaps

regarded as the stronger pair on the team, the

contribution of Marx and Iain Macleod - later to be

Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Heath

government - was real enough. After the War, Marx

played in fewer tournaments but was good enough

to be part of the Great Britain team (in partnership

with Harrison-Gray) which won the 1950 European

Championship, thus completing a hat-trick of

victories for GB. I knew Marx in his later years

when he played at the London Duplicate club, often

with Bob or Jim: he remained a good player and had

matured into a

benevolent elder

statesman of the


The sequence

discussed in the

article was not

impressive. Whilst

the bidding up to

2t was normal

enough, though

cautious players

might pass the

North hand, South's

rebid of 2NT strikes

me as overconservative

and I would have expected 2´: over

this, North should give preference to 3® and South

would then try 3NT. With the 500 bonus for

winning the rubber in prospect, this is a perfectly

decent contract though not makeable on best

defence given the lie of the cards.

I have to say that I disagree with Marx and that I

would not rebid 3t over 2NT. With the queen in

partner's suit and a side ace, I am happy enough

with a no trump contract. South's 3NT rebid was

inconsistent, though understandable, the ten of

diamonds being a valuable card (for instance if

North has QJ9xxx).

East's double is the sort that good players love to

make, though he would have ideally preferred

slightly better diamond intermediates: even the 7

rather than the 6 would have made a deal of

difference. South's redouble is no more than a

victory roll in celebration of having secured another


West's opening lead of a diamond might

charitably be described as uninspired. With clubs

bottled up, and an attractive sequence to lead from,

a heart is far better. I think that South should win

the first heart and immediately attack diamonds:

assuming that declarer plays a top honour from

dummy, there is no point in East ducking, so he

should win and continue a heart. As Marx pointed

out, it is preposterous to regard East's trick one play

of his lowest heart as suit preference. Although there

are times when a suit preference signal at trick one

is appropriate, this is not one of them.

This is the crucial point in the play: declarer

might well decide to

play for hearts to be

4-4 (or 6-2) and win

the second heart - if

he does so, he is

obviously doomed

to defeat. But, if he

ducks, West must be

alert and switch to a

spade (not difficult)

rather than woodenly

continuing with


Although it

smacks of a doubledummy

play, East

had an unlikely chance to beat the contract, or at

least to give declarer the chance to go wrong:

because West held ´9, switching to the two after

winning the first trick might well have been

successful. However, had declarer got the suit right

by playing the ten, this would have resulted in two

redoubled overtricks at 400 points each - expensive

when playing for money!

One final point on the bidding. In discussing

whether or not East should overcall 1´, Marx

assumes, as was standard in those days that a double

by South would be penalty. Nowadays, of course,

most would play it as negative. It is interesting to

note that, in the 1930s, Lieutenant-Colonel Walter

Buller - who was a proponent of natural bidding

and absolutely opposed to artificial conventions -

regarded a double of one-level intervention as

'informatory' (not for penalty).

I think that Marx did a pretty good job of

analysing the bidding and play of this hand: what

do you think? r


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072
  73. Page 0073
  74. Page 0074
  75. Page 0075
  76. Page 0076