Page 0024

24 English Bridge February 2020 www.ebu.co.uk

a BIT. The two players lost their patience and called

the Tournament Director. He came and looked at

the other side of the screen. Both partners had long

since left the room; they too had both passed, but

had then forgotten to push the tray back.

Post-mortems at the end of a board are limited;

fist-bumps through the aperture and high-fives

above the screens are frowned upon, and

conversation is difficult. Sticking your head under

the screen is not recommended; a (famous) Polish

player put his head half-way under the screen to

remonstrate vehemently with his partner, who in

turn was using the flap to push the head back again.

And, after all that, they had actually gained IMPs on

the board!

Being cut off from two of the players at the table

can have its amusing side. There are tales of players

leaving the table to visit the toilets and returning to

the wrong table. Many people told me the story

about David Burn, playing in a team of five, who

couldn't remember who his partner was and,

therefore, which variation of a particular

convention he was meant to be using. At the

Cavendish many years ago, American player Grant

Baze became declarer after what seemed to him to

be a normal auction, but when dummy came down

it had no resemblance to what his partner had

shown in the bidding. He leaned under the aperture

to ask his partner why the hell he had bid that way,

only to discover that his partner and his opponent

were in the wrong seats on the other side of the

screen.

In a Mixed Pairs consolation event at one of the

early European Open Championships, the

Tournament Director was called to a table and

asked why both of his opponents were women, a

fact that had gone unnoticed for more than half of

the event - each side of the screen assumed the

other side had the correct mix of genders. When

asked for an explanation, the two ladies said they

had asked if they could play and the organiser, not

realising they meant play together, had told them

they could.

I like the story of when both pairs were playing a

strong club system. West opened 1® and the tray

was pushed through, whereupon North overcalled

1NT, and alerted it to East as showing four controls.

West bid 2™ and North bid 2´, alerted to East as

balanced. East was getting more and more agitated;

North was making the bids he wanted to make! It

turned out that North was responding to West's bids

as though they had been made by South!

In the early days screens and wooden trays were

rather crude affairs, often built by DIY enthusiasts.

Heather Dhondy told me about the time the tray

was pushed through rather aggressively and she got

a splinter. She waved her hand in reaction to the

pain. Her screen-mate thought this was a vigorous

alert and enquired as to its meaning. 'Splinter!'

replied Heather.

And what effect have screens had on cheating?

Significant, I believe. Of course, some pairs have

been accused of cheating in the way they place their

bids or play their cards, but these are despite screens

rather than because of them.

It is possible to build up a rapport with your

screen-mate. Italian super-star Laurenzo Lauria left

the table while his Swedish opponents were having

a long and tortuous relay auction; he asked his

screen-mate to put Pass cards on the tray for him.

On another occasion, when his opponents' bidding

sequence had clearly gone off the rails, a player

pulled out all his Double cards and put them down

in front of him, playing one each time it was his

turn to bid.

Being too friendly with your screen-mate can

cause problems. When dummy asks to see your

hand, it may seem churlish to refuse, but Gordon

Rainsford tells me that showing your hand to your

opponent, and looking at your opponent's hand, are

both illegal. Following the rules could have

prevented the following mishap. North-South had

won the auction and East and North (due to be

dummy) were looking at each other's hands while

they waited for West to lead. After a while it turned

out that North was declarer and it was East who had

to lead. Who gained more in the play from having

seen their screen-mate's hand, I don't know.

This was the layout of the trump suit on an

infamous board from the European Championships

in Tenerife in 2005:

t J 8 5 4 3

t 7 t Q 10 6

t A K 9 2

The contract was 6t and there was an ace to lose,

so declarer (South) needed to bring in the trump

suit for no losers. The normal thing to do would be

to play diamonds from the top, making the contract

whenever they broke 2-2, or when the tQ was

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070