Page 0047

47

February 2018 English Bridge

www.ebu.co.uk

Declarer may have a two way guess, partner may

have the jack and you have just picked up the suit,

or all manner of bad things may happen.

(b) a heart: 10 marks. Not even close in my view.

This is the safest lead that you can think of from

your hand. If it finds partner with the queen or

something and declarer had a two way guess, well

so be it, but it is the best you can do.

(c) t5: 1 mark. In my opinion this is a terrible lead,

and I would rather lead any of the other suits than

this one. This could carve up all sorts of holdings

when declarer needed to play on the suit for tricks

and partner had holdings like J10xx, Q10xx, or

even something like K108x could get crushed.

Which shows I know nothing(!) as at the table it

was the only safe lead since dummy held AKJ stiff

and partner Qxxxx.

(d) ®3: 4 marks. For exactly the same reasons that

a spade is a poor lead. This could (and at the table

would) save the declarer a two way guess for your

queen, holding AJ10 opposite Kxx.

Pairs Bonus: a heart - 5 marks. This is especially

true at the Pairs game where stopping the

overtrick is as important as defeating the

contract.

The multi is going out of fashion in expert circles

but is still played a lot at club and county levels, so I

hope I can be forgiven for including a hand

involving it here. There are a number of reasons it is

going out of fashion in expert circles, but they

include the fact that on auctions like this, you do

not know which major partner has, so are leading

blind. What can we do in this case….?

Choose from: (a) ´2; (b) ™4 (c) t10; (d) ®2.

Hand 3

´ K 7 5 2

™ 10 7 4

t 10 9 5

® 10 5 2

South West North East

2t1

2NT Pass 3NT Pass2

All Pass

1 Multi - partner has either a weak 2 in

either major or various strong hands.

2 Partner did not bid or double over 3NT so

has a weak 2 in either major.

(a) ´2: 10 marks. The usual rule of thumb is that you

lead your shorter major when you do not know

which one partner has, on the grounds that they

are much more likely to have that one. But look at

your hand here. Partner has at most a 10-count

and you have a 3-count. So the opponents have at

least 27 HCP between them. The only way you are

going to beat this contract is to set up partner's suit

and then for them to get in and cash it. If partner's

suit is hearts, either it will have to set up with one

lead and partner have an entry or set up with

declarer having two stops and partner having two

entries. That is long odds against. You need the

same thing in spades, but if partner's suit is spades

it is much more likely to set up with one lead. I

would never lead this at Pairs (see below), and

would probably lead a heart if I had, say, a 12 count

where I have much more chance of beating the

contract, but here the only realistic chance is that

partner actually has spades. This was rewarded at

the table when partner has ´Qxxxxx and an

outside entry declarer could not avoid.

(b) ™4: 7 marks. If I was not going to lead a spade,

then this is the obvious alternative, but a spade is

better for the reasons above.

(c) t10: 3 marks. Likely to give nothing away, but

what on earth is it going to achieve? You are not

beating this contract by playing passively.

(d) ®2: 1 mark. This is the kind of lead that gets

comments from partner like 'If 2t had shown

clubs or diamonds presumably you would have

led a spade…. '

Pairs Bonus: a heart - 5 marks. For the reasons

given above. You are highly unlikely to beat this

contract, so the object is not to give away cheap

tricks, which a spade lead will do unless partner

happens to have spades, which is simply less likely

than them having hearts. r

Why not take advantage of Alan's

expertiselou@ebu.co.ukhands where the

lead has foxed you? Email the editor,

lou@ebu.co.uk and if suitable, Alan

would be delighted to use them.

SEND IN YOUR LEAD

CONUNDRUMS

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072