Page 0041

APR_08_EB_p40-41 Debate 14/3/08 3:49 pm Page 37

Match-pointed

THE DEBATE

pairs is the best

form of bridge

Or vote by post (Editor, English Bridge, 23 Erleigh Road, Reading RG1 5LR).

Comments for publication (not more than 200 words, please) are welcome. Frances Hinden

ALL across the land, every night of the week 1

Transfer to spades ting just because the contract is a part-score.

at clubs grand and modest, tens of thou- 2

Cue-bid That’s also what makes match-points more

sands of players sit down to play match- 3

Roman Key-card Blackwood fun: because small score differences are so

pointed pairs. Considerably fewer people important, there is always much more bid-

will be playing teams, and yet the ‘Test The 2♣ opening was either a strong or a ding on part-score hands, and wild pre-

Your Play’ or ‘Test Your Defence’ problems weak hand with diamonds, so East could empts, delicate doubled contracts and

in English Bridge are always at rubber or not make an immediate positive response large penalties are seen more often.

teams scoring, never pairs. The same is of 2♠. It is often said that

true of most of the hands you see written North led the ‘Match-pointed pairs is a harder teams of four is the

up by various bridge columnists in the seven of diamonds game . . . and more fun’ purest and most skill-

daily papers. Is that because match-point which went to de- ful form of the game,

scoring is less important or perhaps less clarer’s king. Declarer played the queen of while pairs is ‘imperfect’ and ‘random’. Well,

interesting? Or because it’s less commonly spades and North followed low. At pairs this if you have good enough team-mates, you

played worldwide? No, it’s because pairs is is a difficult problem because declarer has to can sometimes get away with playing less

a far harder game. decide whether it is right to play for an than your best, as their good results will

At teams, defence is simple: beat the overtrick by taking the spade finesse – cover for you. Or you can always blame

contract if you can. At pairs, you don’t risking a possible diamond ruff - or to them for your bad results. At pairs, however,

know when choosing your opening lead if ensure the contract by playing ace and it is all down to your partnership. It’s true

you are trying to stop the second overtrick another trump. How likely is it that the lead that over twenty-four boards in a one-

or ensure the vital second undertrick. was a singleton, given that South did not session pairs event the best pair will win

Similarly, in a teams match it doesn’t double 2♦ or 5♦? Will the rest of the field rather less often than the best team would

matter whether you play in four of a major be in the same contract, or will some people win a short multiple teams, because it

or 3NT if both contacts are making ten have stopped in game or bid a grand slam? makes a big difference if the cards go your

tricks – but at match-points those ten How many will play in a slam by East after a way or not. However, once you start playing

points are the difference between a top 2♠ response to a 2♣ opening? Will every- a lot of deals that factor disappears. Look at

and a bottom. one else get a diamond lead and face the the winners of previous World Open Pairs

Here is a deal from the 2007 National Pairs same problem? This is all part of the fasci- and you will see the world’s top players

final, with partner and me North-South: nation of match-points, while at teams this (such as Fantoni and Nunes, or Meckstroth

is a dull hand: you lead a spade to the ace at and Rodwell). They clearly think these

trick two and ensure the contract, with an events are worth playing in, even without a

♠ QJ862 ♠ A 10 9 7 3 overtrick if the king is singleton. sponsor at the other table paying their

♥ AJ

W

N

E

♥ K52 Pairs is also fairer, because every hand wages.

♦ AK S ♦ J653 counts equally. Last year my team lost the I enjoy every form of bridge, whether it

♣ AK83 ♣ 9 final of a national teams knock-out by less is a rubber with my parents, a county

than the swing on one board when the league match, simultaneous pairs events at

opposition bid a grand slam that depended the club, a national teams knock-out or

West East on a finesse. The other hands in the final even the occasional international event.

2♣ 2♦ set turned out to be virtually irrelevant They are all challenging in different ways.

2NT 3♥ 1 compared to that one 50% decision to bid There would be less variety and much less

4♣2 4♥2 a grand slam. At match-points it doesn’t fun if we had to stop playing match-points

4NT3 5♦ matter whether the contract is 7NT re- because it’s deemed an inferior form of

6♠ All Pass doubled or 1♣. You can’t stop concentra- the game.

www.ebu.co.uk April 2008 English Bridge 37

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056