Page 0019

Ask Jeremy by Jeremy Dhondy

Matters of Disclosure

This is Jeremy Dhondy’s last Laws column and we owe him a very big thank you

for making the Laws intelligible as well as entertaining – no mean feat! – for so long.

The column, however, will continue (see bottom of the page) so please keep your questions coming.

English Bridge and the EBU are not responsible if the information in the letters is incorrect or incomplete.

So perhaps the hand should not have

KEN DAVIES asks: I partner a stranger. DAVID FAIRBARIN writes: I request your come to what followed; however, to

We agree to keep it simple. Acol, weak opinion on the following auction. answer your general point . . .

no-trump, Stayman, transfers and If this were a one off and the agreement

Blackwood. Our opponents join us, West North East South really was 16+, I would take no action

then partner asks if we are to use a 2t1 Pass 2´2 3t because what East has done is psyched. If

strict 12-14 HCP, or use judgement. I 3™ All Pass South is fixed by this then that is life.

reply that we open a good 11-HCP If it is something that happens regularly,

with strong intermediates and down- 1 Weak, any 6-card suit, then West’s description of the system bid

grade 15 HCP with nine small cards. 2 16+ points and asking for partner’s suit. needs amending to something like 16+

RHO says you now have an agreement 2™ would have been a relay with but he has been known to have fewer non-

and defenders cannot reliably count fewer than 16 points. vulnerable.

your hand if you announce 12-14 If West’s bid allows for this while

ergo defenders will be disadvantaged. When dummy tabled his hand, it held explaining it as 16+, then I might take

What should my answer be? only 12 points. South, my partner, action against West for fielding the mis-

called the Director, and I pointed out bid. If, for example West had a maximum

that she was prevented from bidding for his 2t bid, I would want to know why

What you must disclose is your again in the belief that East-West had he bid only 3™ and what calls such as Pass

agreement. It sounds to me as if you have a minimum of 22 points. or Double would be, or bids such as 4t or

a view about what you think you should The Director ruled that the score 4™ might be. The hand in the pass-out

do when you are just outside the range should stand. No-one argued with seat might also want to ask some of these

and many would agree with your assess- this; however, this use of 2´ (Psyche? questions to determine what is going on,

ment. If you open, for example, 20% or Misbid? Irregularity?) seems a cheap but not doing so does not allow East-West

more of your no-trump bids outside the ploy which only stands to gain, since off the hook.

published range (and we all know that partner is bound to bid his six-carder, I do believe that doing it on a 12-count is

Milton Work Count is far from perfect), unknowingly fielding the bid. The 2´ peculiar. If you want to psyche, then a

then you are not telling your opponents bidder can pass, and has smugly mis- weaker hand would be much more suitable.

the whole story. Personally, I would ignore led opponents.

your opponents who sound like barrack- I would appreciate your comments

room lawyers from your description but if on this use of this 2´ bid holding only GOODBYE FROM JEREMY

I played in a regular partnership and 12 points, and whether you would

This is my final column so I would like

opened quite a few 11-counts (which for have any words for East-West and

to thank all readers and the many who

some reason upsets people more than the their bidding in future?

have contributed interesting problems

possibility of you having a 15 count), I

to keep the column going.

might say ‘12-14, occasionally 11’ or some-

thing similar. It’s all in the presentation! The first question I would ask as a The column will, however, be in safe

The most relevant thing is whether your tournament director is why East-West hands as our Chief Tournament

partner acts as if it is 12-14 when raising believed this to be a permitted method. Director, Gordon Rainsford, will be

and does not allow discussion or previous Assuming your club allows anything at taking it over, so from now on you will

experience to let him pass marginal raises. Level 4, then playing the bid as ‘weak only’ have a real expert to consult.

If so, then it is hard to criticise what you is fine and choosing any two suits is also You can send problems to him at

have decided to do. If he allows for the fact fine (i.e. it does not have to be a traditional or by post c/o The

that you may have 11 and does not men- Multi with hearts or spades, it could be Editor, English Bridge, 23 Erleigh Road,

tion this when announcing the range, then spades or clubs but any of the four suits is Reading RG1 5LR. r

the level of disclosure is not sufficient. not allowable in normal club bridge). August 2013 English Bridge 19


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072
  73. Page 0073
  74. Page 0074