Page 0037

Barry Rigal The Debate

Double for Take-out after a Jump to 4M

Or write to the Editor, English Bridge, 23 Erleigh Road, Reading RG1 5LR. Short comments for publication are welcome.

THERE ARE three basic categories of to a five-card suit, or bid 4NT with a two- opponents, I’d probably remove to 4NT.

auction where a double of 4™ or 4´ pro- suited hand. With a minimum balanced Finally we come to advancer’s position

duces controversy. The first occurs after an hand he’d tend to pass and hope for the when second hand has doubled an

opening of 4™ or 4´. The second comes up best. With the second example and the heart opening bid and the opponents have

when second hand passes a one-, two-, or king instead of the ace, pass, don’t double. raised to game. The position is broadly

three-level major suit opening, third hand The identical situation arises when the similar whether they have bid hearts or

raises to game, and fourth hand doubles. opponents open a suit and raise to game. spades (or have opened at the one-level or

The third sequence arises when second The opponents are now expected to have a pre-empted): advancer will bid spades

hand doubles a major suit opening (again bigger fit than over the four-level opening, over hearts if he can (or 4NT with a two-

at the one-, two-, or three-level), and third but responder’s jump to game limits the suited hand, typically the minors over 4™)

hand raises to game, with advancer (i.e, partnership values. You may run into a few so advancer’s double denies that hand.

the doubler’s partner) doubling. pairs (facing a limited opening bid) who Advancer’s double here should again not

What I plan to say applies to both spade jump to game with a balanced 12-count; be construed as penalties based on trumps.

and heart sequences, although the take- more likely is that the opponents have With:

out element applies slightly more to the approximately half the deck and ten cards ´ QJ93 ™ K54 t 1073 ® 974

auctions where the opponents bid hearts in their suit. I might not double with the pass over 4´ and wait for partner to

as 4´ is a possible final contract for your first quoted example hand above – but double again, then pass. ‘Transferable

side. make the club jack into the queen and I values’ sums up what is expected – the

Critical to these sequences is that would. Since the opponents have a real fit, cynical would say it asks partner to make

whether playing pairs or teams you want your double must be primarily take-out the last mistake.

to be able to double and describe your here. Pass with the balanced strong hand I’d expect such a double to be the

hand as frequently as possible, rather than and take your small penalty. equivalent of a hand that would expect

maximising the gain that arises from the So how should you respond to a double partner to make any contract if he

call. Being able to double an opening of 4™ and a double of 4´ here? I suggest removes the double. So if he has doubled

bid of 4™ to show ™K-J-9-x would leave you consider a double of 4™ as one you with extras or real shape he bids. A

you well placed, but you will never have should take out if you have a sensible borderline hand for passing out 4´

that hand. Conversely, doubling every destination in mind in the form of a one- doubled would be:

time you have an opening hand comes up or two-suited hand, high-card points not- ´ 3 ™ A974 t AQ85 ® KQ104.

frequently, but leaves the responding hand withstanding. I’d remove a double of 4™ The 4-4-4-1 shape is not nearly as

far less well placed. to 4´ with, say: promising as a 5-4-3-1 pattern. I would

So I’m going to suggest that the right ´ K954 ™ 107 t J10864 ®95. surely act were the diamond five the club

place on the axis to have the double is This would work well enough here. As to three instead.

much closer to take-out than penalty, the double of 4´, again remove with shape, To sum up, I may be naïve in believing

precisely because the more cards in one but I’d consider the double closer to the opponents, but I play that if they get to

suit your RHO has, the fewer cards you are optional here. Vulnerable with 5-4 in the the four-level in a hurry they are probably

likely to hold. You don’t want to wait to minors and fewer than 6 points, I’d tend to right. I double, expecting partner to

double until both you and RHO have pass. Non-vulnerable with one spade (or remove if he thinks he has a reason, and

length in the same suit. three, so that I could infer real shortage only to pass if he knows it is right or if he

At the ‘minimum-shapely’ end of the opposite) and especially facing vulnerable thinks everything else is worse. r

spectrum you should double 4™ with:

´ Q1063 ™ 4 t AQ73 ® KJ64.

At the ‘balanced, working high-cards’ THE ‘DEBATE’ TAKES A BREAK

end of the spectrum I’d happily double 4™ Our ‘Debate’ column has being going strong for over five years, but we now feel it

with: is time it took a break. It will come back when we have put together a new, strong

´ AQ3 ™ A104 t Q92 ® KJ64. list of suitable topics. In the meantime, we can look forward to a new column of

Partner will remove the double with a ‘Great Bridge Disasters’, by David Burn, starting in 2013.

singleton heart and a few scattered values December 2012 English Bridge 37


  1. Issue 244
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0005
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056