Page 0005

JUNE_10_EB_p05 Robson:EB_Layout 3 06/05/2010 16:57 Page 5

Leave in partner’s take-out

PAIRS TACTICS

doubles more often at pairs

HAVE you ever crowed that you haven’t have not yet mentioned*). Yes, once in

doubled the opponents into game all year? a while the opponents will make their

Well to be honest it’s nothing to crow doubled part-score – into game and

about – it almost certainly means you’re you’ll get a bottom. Most of the time,

not doubling enough. however, you’ll defeat the contract and

Say the bidding begins do very nicely, thank you. At teams (or

rubber) you’d probably be well advised

Andrew Robson

West North East South to bid 3t, as the cost of 3® doubled

3® Dble Pass ? into game is painful (although it

would not surprise me to hear that 3 The key decision. Passing is risky, of course.

As South, you must decide what to do in passing 3® doubled was a long-term But does bidding 4® feel like the way to

response to partner’s take-out double. Here winner there too). garner match-points? Sometimes it’s a

are four possible hands you might hold: good idea to take an action that, if

successful, will reward you with a good

Love All. Dealer South. result.

Hand 1 Hand 2 ´ J 10 2

´ AQ732 ´ A753 ™ AQ932 4® (doubled) would have been very un-

™ Q 10 5 ™ KJ73 t 8 pleasant for East-West. 3t doubled was

t K7 t Q 10 ® A 10 7 4 different. Yes, declarer could have made

® 752 ® 742 ´ AK93 ´ Q86 his doubled contract. However, he did not

™ KJ754 N ™ 10 6 have X-Ray vision – a point you must

W E

Hand 3 Hand 4 t Q S t 10 9 5 2 always bear in mind when opting to

´ 74 ´ 86 ® Q65 ® K982 defend.

™ J9742 ™ J74 ´ 754 West led the ace of spades, East encour-

t K6 t A862 ™ 8 aging with the eight (standard ‘throw high

® 8642 ® J942 t AKJ7643 means aye’ signals). West cashed the king

® J3 of spades and followed with the three, East

winning with the queen. That lowest

1. You must jump to 4´. It would be a spade from West sent the message that

major (excuse pun) error to bid just West North East South East could underlead the king of clubs (he

3´, even though it is generally a 3t1 would lead the highest of his two

mistake to push too hard for games at Dble2 Pass Pass3 Pass remaining spades without the queen (or

pairs. Even facing a minimum double, king) or clubs.

4´ should be easy provided partner is 1 No one could accuse South of having Declarer beat the queen of clubs with

reasonably shape-suitable. made a frisky pre-empt. dummy’s ace and could have made his

2. 4®. Again you must go for game, as a 2 Whether you would double a 1t opener contract if he had led a trump to the ace

minimum-level response is consistent or overcall with 1™ would be a matter for (felling West’s singleton queen), then fines-

with holding a Yarborough. You bid debate (in the modern style, many would sed the queen of hearts and dumped his

4® to ask partner to pick a game, that bid 1™ to locate a 5-3 fit, planning to club loser on the ace of hearts. Naturally,

way ensuring that a major-suit fit is double later). Over a 3t opener, double however, he assumed that East had better

found (should there be one). (rather than 3™) is clear-cut: you don’t have trumps to convert the double. He finessed

3. 3™. You would jump with a decent 9 the luxury of the overcall-then-double the jack, and now West could win the

points, so this bid shows 0-8. No route. queen and lead to East’s king of clubs. East

problem. had to score a trump trick with his t10-9-x

4. This is where it gets interesting. I am *The vulnerability is almost always hugely rele- and that meant down two.

convinced (and so is the computer – vant in competitive auctions. However, some-

after thousands of hands have been times the factors counter-balance one another.

entered in similar scenarios) that the For example, while it is superficially more attrac- Andrew’s Tip: Leave in partner’s take-

winning action at pairs is to pass tive to double a vulnerable opponent (larger out doubles more often at pairs – pay

partner’s double. And that’s regard- penalty), do bear in mind that he is likely to have off to the odd bottom. r

less of the vulnerability (which we a better hand for his vulnerable pre-empt.

www.ebu.co.uk June 2010 English Bridge 5

Index

  1. Number 229
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056