Page 0025

DEC_8_EB_p23 and 25 Letters 13/11/08 5:11 pm Page 25

LETTERS CONTINUED from page 23 Punishment enough

I HAVE to confess that I took after an age surfaced with 3♥

advantage of my partner’s (a four-card suit). I responded

Level 4 problems hesitation.

Almost a year ago I met up

3♠ and after due deliberation

partner bid 4♠. To me, it was

with a bridge orphan who had clear partner had a problem

THERE has been some debate Of these, the natural open- not played for about thirty hand: he had 4-4 in the majors,

on http://forums.bridgetalk. ings and the artificial strong years and was trying to find and was either 4 -1 or 5-0 in

com/ about the merits (or openings are just as likely to be his way into the game again. the minors and must have

otherwise) of the EBU system encountered at Level 2, so We agreed on a twelve month points to account for the

regulations at Level 4. Some need not be discussed other trial during which time I prolonged bidding. So I took

contend that many permitted than in passing. would do my best to bring him advantage of his perceived

methods are infrequent enough Without advocating one up to speed with some of the problem and bid 6♠.

and unusual enough that it is point of view in particular, we more modern bidding systems, After a heart lead partner

unreasonable to expect all would like to suggest that an defensive signals, etc. Some- placed dummy on the table:

players to be able to deal with article discussing possible def- times it has been tortuous

them at short notice in, for ences to artificial bids promi- waiting for him to come up

example, the National Pairs sing a different suit, artificial with his rebid (I know – he ♠ A942

competition. Others believe suits denying (by inference) the should know his proposed ♥ 8753

that the wider range of systems suit bid, and multi-way weak/ rebid before making the open- ♦ 97

available is simply part of the strong bids would be of interest ing bid) and the same waiting ♣ 10 6 2

cut-and-thrust of competition, and potential benefit to a wide for him to respond to a bid of

and if opponents achieve a proportion of the readership mine. Many are the times in

good score because their of English Bridge and could, if the car on the way to or from a I thanked partner, duly went

unusual methods right-side a desired, form part of a short game that I lecture him on the two off for an almost clear

contract, or because they can series. need to ‘speed up’. bottom, and kept my own

pre-empt on a wider range of Henry Lockwood and Recently, playing pairs at the counsel – until the end of the

hands, that is part of the game. Matt Johnson, by e-mail club, I picked up: evening! I then pointed out to

Examination of the Orange him that the bidding should

Book indicates that there are The idea of some articles to have gone at the speed of light

five classes of opening suit bid discuss defences to less common ♠ Q 10 7 6 to 4♠ and admitted I bid 6♠

permitted at Level 4: Level 4 conventions is a good ♥ AK on the strength of his agoni-

• Natural (showing the suit one and will be pursued in a ♦ AK2 sing. Partner then pointed out

bid, at some strength). future issue. In the meantime, ♣ AQ85 I had once told him that after a

• Artificial. Jeremy Dhondy offers advice on 1NT or 2NT opening bid

• Promising a specified suit page 27. responder was ‘boss of the

other than the one bid. And opened 2NT (20-22). With auction’ and that as the no-

• Denying the suit bid.

THE OCTOBER DEBATE:

the opposition silent through- trump bidder I should have

• Promising a strong hand,

Thank you for voting.

out, partner went into one of passed his 4♠ bid.

not related to the suit bid. The votes were split

his trances and eventually Oops, sorry partner!

• Openings that could be 50-50, so it looks as came up with 3♣ (five-card Should I have called the

either strong or weak. though Great Bridge is Stayman). After my response Director for taking advantage

There is also the option to play both Percentage and of 3♦ denying a five-card of partner’s unauthorised non-

an intermediate and artificial Flair Bridge! major – we keep it simple – he information?

1NT opening. went deep into the tank and David Pollard. Alnwick

Variations on a theme

ANDREW Kambites’ article never struck me as being par- and to which I gave the name bid overcall is used to show a

on Two-suited Overcalls in the ticularly useful to treat a cue- Quantum (from Cue-bid, UNT solid suit and asks partner to

October 2008 issue of English bid of the opponent’s suit as and Michaels), overcomes these bid 3NT with a stopper in the

Bridge outlined a variation of natural. Nor do I like having to difficulties: opponent’s suit. When was

Ghestem in which, over a 1♣ give up a jump overcall in Over 1♣ or 1♦, a cue-bid the last time you ever needed

opening, 2♣ was natural and clubs to an artificial meaning shows the extremes (spades that?

2♦ showed both majors, and when it is clearly preferable (in and the unbid minor); 2NT Over a 1♥ or 1 ♠ opening, I

over a 1♦ or 1♥ or 1♠ open- terms of memory load, if shows the lowest two unbid like to revert to using standard

ing, 3♣ showed a two-suited nothing else) to be able to use suits (hearts and the other Michaels cue-bids so that once

hand. it naturally. minor) while a jump cue-bid again 3 ♣ is available as a

Although a 1♣ opening may A variant of Ghestem I shows both majors. natural bid.

be made on a short suit, it has devised over thirty years ago, Traditionally, a jump cue- Mike Wenble, by e-mail

www.ebu.co.uk December 2008 English Bridge 25

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064