Page 0050

DEC_08_EB_p50-51 Debate 14/11/08 10:10 am Page 46

THE DEBATE

With 4-4 in a major

and a minor,

open the major

Two top players debate a hot bridge topic. Tell us whose argument

Sally Brock has won you over by e-mailing the Editor at elena@ebu.co.uk

WITH 4-4 in a major and a minor and a 1NT – 2♣ (Checkback) – 2♥ – 2♠ – 2NT – 9 or so and would respond at the two level

hand too strong for a weak no-trump it is 3NT. Ouch! If there’s a winning defence to anyway, allowing opener to rebid 2NT. So

best to open the major. That is a sentiment find, you would expect them to find it! at game level at least, declarer would be

with which I most heartily concur. the stronger hand.

Making it dangerous At part-score level I admit it would be

As few bids as possible better for the stronger hand to be declarer

I don’t much mind if I play a five-card and in my methods he probably won’t be,

When I played bridge twenty or so years major or a four-card major system. But it but this can be overrated. I once developed

ago I tried to bid every hand scientifically, seems to me that if you are playing four- a strong club system which had one little

aiming for the best contract every time. I card majors, then to get full advantage you flaw and in a big pairs field I found myself

now think that is an impractical aim and should open one as often as possible. declaring 3NT with J-x-x in diamonds and

losing philosophy. My thinking is more in If I open 1♠ when I am 4-4 with clubs nothing else, and a balanced 26-count in the

line with that often quoted by Michael or diamonds, my opponent has to intro- dummy. However, the opening lead was a

Rosenberg, that when you get to declare a duce his heart suit at the two level or not diamond from Q-10-x-x-x and I was the

hand you want to have arrived there in as at all. If he wishes to make a weak jump only player in the room to make 3NT!

few bids as possible. overcall, he has to do so at the three level. Of course, when there is a 4-4 major fit

In my view many players lose sight of A particularly favourite auction is when it I will gain in the declaring stakes because I

basic bidding theory. If you have game goes, for example, 1♠ – (Pass) – 2♠ – (Pass) will bid 1♥ – 2♥ – 2NT – 3♥/4♥ or 1♥ –

values or thereabouts, investigate eight- – Pass – ? Where the 1♠ is always or usually 3♥ – 4♥. They, on the other hand, will bid

card major-suit fits and if you don’t have a five-card suit, there will usually be an 1♣/1♦ – 1♥ – 2♥/3♥, and the weaker

one, bid 3NT. Only rarely are you eight-card fit for both sides, making it hand will be declarer. And that brings me

interested in minor-suit games, especially pretty safe for the opposition to balance. to another point . . .

in uncontested auctions. However, playing a four-card major system,

If I open the major with my 4-4 balanced where you raise freely with three-card What does it mean when opener

hand, there is a good chance the bidding support, then someone balancing in that raises responder’s major?

will go 1♠ – 3♠ – 4♠. Or 1♠ – 2♠ – 2NT ‘standard’ sequence may have a nasty shock

– 4♠. Or 1♠ – 2♠ – 2NT – 3NT. We have coming. Take a straightforward sequence: 1♣ – 1♥ –

arrived at our game in the suit opened or 2♥. For me, opener can’t have a balanced

no-trumps without telling the opponents The positional element hand or he would have opened 1NT. So he

anything about any other suits. either has four-card support, or three-card

However, if, with 4-4 in spades and, say, For me the best argument that the ‘open support and a singleton, but in either case

clubs, you open 1♣, and partner responds the minor’ brigade have is that of he’d be fairly minimum in terms of high-

1♥, what now? 1♠ or 1NT? Modern theory positionality. They will tell you that if it is card values. However, the ‘open-the-minor’

opts for 1NT, and I would agree that this is a hand on which strong no-trumpers brigade surely have to encompass the above,

the better option, but you will miss a 4-4 would bid 1NT – 3NT, or 1NT – 2 ♣ – as well as a 4-4-3-2 hand in the 15–16 range.

spade fit when partner does not have the 2 any – 3NT, or even 1NT – 2NT – 3NT, Or do they bid 3♥ with those hands (in

values to move. It also means that when you then they will bid 1 minor – 1 major – which case they are getting a level higher

do rebid 1NT and partner does have the 1NT etc. and the stronger hand will be than necessary when partner is minimum)?

values to bid on, he needs to investigate a declarer. Whereas my auction will go 1 If they bid 2♥, then how does responder

spade fit, therefore revealing more about major – 1NT – 2NT – 3NT, or some such, know whether to make a game try when

both hands to the opposition. Suppose leaving the responding hand at the helm. opener has a range of 11–16 points?

opener is 3-3-3-4 and responder is 4-4-3-2, I admit that they have a point. But Overall, to my mind, it is not even close!

my auction would be: 1♣ – 1♥ – 1NT – remember that when opener has 15 or 16 The practical action for practical players is

3NT. The alternative would be: 1♣ – 1♥ – points, for game to be on responder needs to open the major.

46 English Bridge December 2008 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064