Page 0024

AUG_08_EB_p23_24 Letters.qxd 16/7/08 12:55 pm Page 24

LETTERS CONTINUED from page 23 ‘Angelfish’ Restricted

THE OK Bridge on-line bridge Choice

club encourages good behav-

Send your letters to the Editor, Mis-play iour and one of the ways in

which it does so is by having a

WITH reference to Brian

Senior’s June article on

Elena Jeronimidis, 23 Erleigh Road,

AN announcement spoiled my monthly roll of honour with Restricted Choice, there is a

Reading RG1 5LR,

or e-mail elena@ebu.co.uk enjoyment of the Corwen. an ‘Angelfish’ of the month. much simpler way to prove

Arriving at a table, I realised I think that all the members that in the TV game show it

The editor reserves the right we had played this pair in the of the EBU would benefit if pays to always swap.

to condense letters.

National Pairs at exactly the English Bridge could have a Originally the contestant has

Publication does not mean the EBU same spot at Hinckley. When I similar column where players a one in three chance of win-

agrees with the views expressed or remarked on this, North replied who have shown courtesy, ning and if he makes no change

that the comments are factually that this was actually a different good manners, and sportsman- to his original choice he wins

correct.

lady partner. ‘I’m prettier,’ she ship at the bridge table would one in three.

announced firmly. be nominated each month. But if he decides he will

This seemed to affect my Of course, sportsmanship always swap, then he wins

Time limit partner, who clearly wanted to

impress by raising my 1♠ res-

does not mean setting oneself

up above the laws and letting

when his original choice was

wrong and loses when his

FOLLOWING on from your ponse to his 1♦ to 3♠: players off for misdemeanours, original choice was correct –

June article on master points, but for explaining the rules to in other words he wins twice

I, being an average player who ♠ AJ9x ♠ Kxxx all players in a friendly, non- as often as he loses because his

occasionally forgets the odd ♥ xx W

N

E

♥ AQ10 hostile manner. In fact, once original choice was twice as

card, have also forgotten twice ♦ AKx S

♦ Q109xx somebody has made a mistake, likely to be wrong.

in my life-time to send in my ♣ AKQx ♣ x the Director should be sum- If he doesn’t swap, he wins

master points. moned in a dignified way, and one in three. If he swaps, he

Why is there a three-year Not to be outdone, I quickly only then would a player be al- wins two in three. If he swaps

limit? I put myself in the cate- closed proceedings with a firm lowed to waive his rights to sometimes at random he wins

gory of not playing as much as 7NT. (Why not? I couldn’t con- punish the erring opponent. half the time.

I used to, but I did still achieve struct a hand where he did not Harold Schogger, Edgware S.J. Laredo, Pyrford

those points to no avail. have the ♥A.)

Roy West, by e-mail At this point the young lady

THE JUNE DEBATE: Thank you for your letters and e-mails.

called out either in surprise or

Count signals win the debate with 90% of the votes.

Colin Porch, Master-point Secre- (I hoped) in admiration, and

tary, replies: We do occasional- North led a small club.

ly have to check on the validity

of some of the certificates

I most certainly must also

have been under the spell of

National Rating Scheme

presented for registration. Ask- the announcement as, having GLAD to see that a National rate partnerships rather than

ing issuers to confirm awards established the diamonds were Ratings Scheme for bridge individuals. All partnership

up to three years old is consi- breaking, I rejected the option may be attempted (your June results would be on the

dered reasonable – whether of the backward finesse in spa- 2008 editorial). As in the chess database, but only reasonably

they could oblige for older des and took the losing finesse. rating system, it is so impor- regular partnerships (say a

awards is more problematical. North had the queen and South tant to factor in the strength of minimum of 10 ‘appearances’

Moreover, it takes a conside- the ten. One down. one’s opponents. per rating year) would actually

rable amount of time to count I was stupid. First, would However, I still feel that it be published.

three years’ worth of points. If, anyone holding a vital queen would be more appropriate to Paul Habershon, Bedford

at the end of that procedure, the make any sort of comment du-

total reached differs from that ring the auction? Second, would Mature lady, attractive, seeks male and

claimed by the member, then a good player not go totally female partners to progress onto more

we have to count them again. passive leading against 7NT? advanced bridge – green pts etc.

Imagine how long it takes to So a potentially dangerous club Home or abroad. London area.

count 30,000 points, largely lead might well have indicated Contact Blue2, Old Estate Yard, East

made up of awards from 10 to holding ♦J and ♠Q. Hendred, Oxon OX12 8LL (box no 249)

36, on pieces of paper of vary- Most importantly, anyone

ing sizes and shapes. can take a finesse; taking a win-

Note, however, that from ning backward finesse would A presentable lady with a passion for bridge

April 2010 Master Points will be really have got me a barrel-load is looking for a brilliant male partner in the

credited electronically. Thus the of admiring glances if it worked northwest to help her up to an even higher

process will be a lot quicker and – and would get me remem- bridge ranking. 07790 256 399

imposing a time limit will no bered if it didn’t! A sense of humour may be necessary.

longer be necessary. Dave Robinson, by e-mail

24 English Bridge August 2008 www.ebu.co.uk

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064