Page 0041

JUNE_08_EB_p40-41 Debate 12/5/08 1:04 pm Page 37

Count signals


are best

Or vote by post (Editor, English Bridge, 23 Erleigh Road, Reading RG1 5LR).

Comments for publication (not more than 200 words, please) are welcome. Paul Bowyer

ONE of the most important techniques in with the king of spades and partner

the game is for defenders to be able to follows small. Does partner have two small ♠A83

count declarer’s hand. When you, as a cards (in which case you need to get him Dummy

defender, have a complete count of the on lead), or three small cards (in which

deal (in other words you know the hand case the suit is yours to run)? If your ♠QJ965 West

patterns of both declarer and partner), primary method is encourage/discourage,

defence becomes that much easier. To that then partner will always play a discouraging

end, often the most important early card whenever he doesn’t hold the king of You lead the queen which is won by decla-

information you can have is partner’s spades. Of course, that isn’t the infor- rer’s king. If you now get on lead, is it safe to

length in the suit in which you have made mation you require on this deal – it is continue the suit? If partner has three cards,

the opening lead. whether declarer still has the guarded ten then yes ; if a doubleton then no (declarer

Now, ‘standard’ encourage/discourage of spades or not. True, there are some may have ♠ K-10-x). How can you tell?

methods have the third player following ambiguous positions – it may be hard to Here is an example from a suit contract:

with a low card as discouragement and a tell whether a peter is from two or four

high card as encouragement. ‘Standard’ cards in some rare cases – but equally

length showing count have a peter (high- there are many situations where all is clear ♠ J 10 5 2

low) as showing an even number of cards, with the play of the first card. Dummy

and following upwards (low-high) as Here are a couple of common distri-

showing an odd number. That is what I butions where length is more important ♠AK84 West

shall assume here in this article. than strength (if you see what I mean):

Suppose that you hold a side suit headed

by the A-K-Q against a trump contract. Here you lead the ace (or king, according to

Naturally, you lead off your top cards and ♠A83 taste) and that goes small, small, queen.

see what happens. Suppose dummy displays Dummy Now, if playing attitude signals, partner has

three small cards in the suit. Now, what had to play a discouraging card as he does

should your partner play from holdings of ♠ K Q 10 6 5 West

not have the spade queen. But can you cash

two small, three small and four small a second round of this suit? Who knows?

cards? If the answer is that you would Playing count signals there are many occa-

always play your lowest card – to dis- Defending against a no-trump contract, sions that make it quite clear what you can

courage a continuation – then the opening you naturally lead the spade king. Now, if or cannot do at trick two.

leader doesn’t know how many of this suit partner is going to play his lowest card Note, in passing, that there may be some

are cashable either now or later in the whenever he doesn’t hold the jack you ambiguities here even with length signals.

hand. This is the trap that encourage/ don’t know what to do if you are left on Suppose partner follows with the spade six

discourage proponents fall into: they think lead. Does declarer have ♠ J-x-x, where and declarer with the spade queen. Now

that you want to know if partner can help you must switch? Or does he have ♠ J-x, declarer might hold ♠ Q-3 and partner

in the suit whereas, in fact, all you want to where you must continue with the queen? ♠ 9-7-6. Alternatively, partner might hold

know is how many rounds of the suit will It’s a nightmare. With length signals, it is ♠ 9-7-6-3 with declarer holding the single-

stand up. Now, most players will peter likely that you can sort out the ambiguities: ton queen. To clear up some of these un-

with two cards (perhaps hoping for a ruff) if partner follows with the spade two, then certainties. it is important to agree with

but cannot distinguish between three and you can continue with the queen. If part- partner what to play with four small cards.

four card holdings. ner’s two was a singleton, well, c’est la vie – Many experts choose the second highest

Try another example. You lead the queen at least there was little point in switching from four small (so would play the seven

from ♠ A-Q-J-9-x against 3NT bid after so that partner would lead a spade back . . . from ♠ 9-7-6-3). This doesn’t clear up all

an uninformative auction and dummy Here are other similar positions. This the ambiguous positions, but it will clarify

puts down two small spades. Declarer wins one is against no-trumps: most – and that is all you can ask for. June 2008 English Bridge 37


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056