Page 0045

JUNE_08_EB_p45 Quiz_answer + Floor 13/5/08 12:04 pm Page 41

From the floor: the April Debate

Thank you for your votes and comments. Teams play, and its champion, Ian Payn, win the debate with 87% of the votes!

I HAVE to choose teams over pairs. It’s not compare with bidding and making a only format available: why bother with

more of a pure game, being closer to rubber slam. Somehow half the pleasure and safety at the risk of missing the all-

bridge where a lot of people, including excitement is in bidding good slams and important overtrick? But Frances Hinden is

myself, grew up learning. All the best honing (in my dreams at least) the bidding right about one thing: we do need a form of

competitions in the world are teams: the system to locate them. You could decide the game that is all down to the individual

Bermuda Bowl, the Rosenblum, and the never to bid a slam and I doubt it would partnership. We just don’t need the antiqua-

European championships. The pairs events make any difference to your pairs results. ted scoring system that goes with it.

at these competitions are side events for Finally, penalising (what I consider) fri- I can play in a computer bridge pairs

those teams who don’t make it far enough. volous overcalls is very difficult, and even competition which uses IMPs scoring. With

I also dislike it at pairs when you think when you do it is still just one deal. a laptop and a simple program it should be

you’ve just had a normal result and find it’s Keith George, by e-mail as easy to score a club pairs using IMPs. The

a crater when some muppet has gone for EBU would be doing a great service to clubs

800 or 1100 in something ridiculous. That BRIAN Senior’s article on safety plays if it made such software readily available.

affects the board over the whole room, would be wasted if pairs scoring were the Dick Heasman, Fareham

whereas in a match it’s a one off.

Craig Fisher, Carlisle

I FOUND this an interesting discussion,

but one which could have gone further.

Firstly, Ian Payn’s article assumed a teams

event scored by IMPs. Many good players

PRIZE PLAY ANSWER eight ever, nine never – works with the

would argue that teams scored by point-a- cards as in the diagram but is not the

Prizes kindly donated by PIATNIK, correct play. Instead, you should cross to

board is a greater test of skill.

makers of playing cards since 1824 the ace of diamonds, intending to

Secondly, Frances Hinden’s example hand

finesse East for the queen. As the cards

was not well chosen. It is only wrong to take

QUIZ master Julian Pottage gives his lie, the queen pops up, solving your

the spade finesse when South has specifical- problem.

view of the best line of play in our April

ly the singleton spade king and six dia- If, on the second round of diamonds,

competition and awards prizes in three

monds, which I make to be less than a 1% categories. East shows out or West wins with the

chance. As Andrew Robson pointed out in queen, you do not mind. In both cases,

his article, it is frequency of gain that mat- West will win a diamond trick (on the

ters, and this surely means that the finesse is ♠ A762 third round of the suit if East shows out

the indicated play. ♥ 92 on the second) but live to regret it. A

Finally, in over thirty-five years of playing ♦ AJ75 club exit into the tenace or a heart –

in such matches, I have never seen a knock- ♣ QJ3 giving a ruff-and-discard – will spare

out match decided purely by a large swing ♠ 10 8 ♠5 you a club loser.

N

caused by a winning finesse in a grand slam: ♥ J 8 6 5 W E ♥ A K Q 10 7 4 3 This line fails only if West has all the

♦ 86 S ♦Q3 missing diamonds and the club finesse

particularly in a long match, there are al-

♣ K9765 ♣842

ways many opportunities for the losing side. fails. East would more than likely have

♠KQJ943

Richard Fleet, Berkhamsted doubled 6♠ to ask for an unusual lead if

♥ Void

♦ K 10 9 4 2 void in diamonds, making the chance of

PAIRS and teams are obviously both skilful ♣ A 10 failure very low.

and interesting games, but pairs is unsatis-

factory in some ways. The most obvious

You play in 6♠ after East opened 4♥. Congratulations to the winners:

problem is that you play a very small num-

West leads the five of hearts.

ber of deals against each set of opponents County: Richard Wheen,

You should ruff the heart, draw trumps

and so never get a feel about them (how Buckland, Surrey

ending in dummy and ruff another heart.

they bid, how good they are etc.) in one Now you need to tackle the diamonds. Regional: Neil Drapkin,

session. A couple of weak pairs can lead to In view of East’s heart length, you might Gerrards Cross, Bucks

all sorts of anomalies in result – and good feel inclined to cash the king of Open: David Moulds,

results against them are essential. diamonds and finesse West for the Leighton Buzzard, Beds

But the worst aspect for me is simply the queen. This results in defeat when East

fact that slams are no more important than holds the missing queen and the club

the meanest part-score. Getting the extra finesse fails. This month’s new

overtrick in, say, 1NT (for any reason, often Playing for the drop in diamonds – Play Quiz is featured on page 35.

an accident anyway of the lead), just does

www.ebu.co.uk June 2008 English Bridge 41

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056