JUNE_08_EB_p45 Quiz_answer + Floor 13/5/08 12:04 pm Page 41
From the floor: the April Debate
Thank you for your votes and comments. Teams play, and its champion, Ian Payn, win the debate with 87% of the votes!
I HAVE to choose teams over pairs. It’s not compare with bidding and making a only format available: why bother with
more of a pure game, being closer to rubber slam. Somehow half the pleasure and safety at the risk of missing the all-
bridge where a lot of people, including excitement is in bidding good slams and important overtrick? But Frances Hinden is
myself, grew up learning. All the best honing (in my dreams at least) the bidding right about one thing: we do need a form of
competitions in the world are teams: the system to locate them. You could decide the game that is all down to the individual
Bermuda Bowl, the Rosenblum, and the never to bid a slam and I doubt it would partnership. We just don’t need the antiqua-
European championships. The pairs events make any difference to your pairs results. ted scoring system that goes with it.
at these competitions are side events for Finally, penalising (what I consider) fri- I can play in a computer bridge pairs
those teams who don’t make it far enough. volous overcalls is very difficult, and even competition which uses IMPs scoring. With
I also dislike it at pairs when you think when you do it is still just one deal. a laptop and a simple program it should be
you’ve just had a normal result and find it’s Keith George, by e-mail as easy to score a club pairs using IMPs. The
a crater when some muppet has gone for EBU would be doing a great service to clubs
800 or 1100 in something ridiculous. That BRIAN Senior’s article on safety plays if it made such software readily available.
affects the board over the whole room, would be wasted if pairs scoring were the Dick Heasman, Fareham
whereas in a match it’s a one off.
Craig Fisher, Carlisle
I FOUND this an interesting discussion,
but one which could have gone further.
Firstly, Ian Payn’s article assumed a teams
event scored by IMPs. Many good players
PRIZE PLAY ANSWER eight ever, nine never – works with the
would argue that teams scored by point-a- cards as in the diagram but is not the
Prizes kindly donated by PIATNIK, correct play. Instead, you should cross to
board is a greater test of skill.
makers of playing cards since 1824 the ace of diamonds, intending to
Secondly, Frances Hinden’s example hand
finesse East for the queen. As the cards
was not well chosen. It is only wrong to take
QUIZ master Julian Pottage gives his lie, the queen pops up, solving your
the spade finesse when South has specifical- problem.
view of the best line of play in our April
ly the singleton spade king and six dia- If, on the second round of diamonds,
competition and awards prizes in three
monds, which I make to be less than a 1% categories. East shows out or West wins with the
chance. As Andrew Robson pointed out in queen, you do not mind. In both cases,
his article, it is frequency of gain that mat- West will win a diamond trick (on the
ters, and this surely means that the finesse is ♠ A762 third round of the suit if East shows out
the indicated play. ♥ 92 on the second) but live to regret it. A
Finally, in over thirty-five years of playing ♦ AJ75 club exit into the tenace or a heart –
in such matches, I have never seen a knock- ♣ QJ3 giving a ruff-and-discard – will spare
out match decided purely by a large swing ♠ 10 8 ♠5 you a club loser.
caused by a winning finesse in a grand slam: ♥ J 8 6 5 W E ♥ A K Q 10 7 4 3 This line fails only if West has all the
♦ 86 S ♦Q3 missing diamonds and the club finesse
particularly in a long match, there are al-
♣ K9765 ♣842
ways many opportunities for the losing side. fails. East would more than likely have
Richard Fleet, Berkhamsted doubled 6♠ to ask for an unusual lead if
♦ K 10 9 4 2 void in diamonds, making the chance of
PAIRS and teams are obviously both skilful ♣ A 10 failure very low.
and interesting games, but pairs is unsatis-
factory in some ways. The most obvious
You play in 6♠ after East opened 4♥. Congratulations to the winners:
problem is that you play a very small num-
West leads the five of hearts.
ber of deals against each set of opponents County: Richard Wheen,
You should ruff the heart, draw trumps
and so never get a feel about them (how Buckland, Surrey
ending in dummy and ruff another heart.
they bid, how good they are etc.) in one Now you need to tackle the diamonds. Regional: Neil Drapkin,
session. A couple of weak pairs can lead to In view of East’s heart length, you might Gerrards Cross, Bucks
all sorts of anomalies in result – and good feel inclined to cash the king of Open: David Moulds,
results against them are essential. diamonds and finesse West for the Leighton Buzzard, Beds
But the worst aspect for me is simply the queen. This results in defeat when East
fact that slams are no more important than holds the missing queen and the club
the meanest part-score. Getting the extra finesse fails. This month’s new
overtrick in, say, 1NT (for any reason, often Playing for the drop in diamonds – Play Quiz is featured on page 35.
an accident anyway of the lead), just does
www.ebu.co.uk June 2008 English Bridge 41