Page 0037

37

August 2017 English Bridge

www.ebu.co.uk

Clearly your partner's hesitation (Unauthorised

Information) does suggest bidding on rather than

passing, but your director has made the reasonable

assessment that there is no 'Logical Alternative' to

bidding on with your hand.

One way of judging this is to poll other players,

giving them your hand but not telling them of the

hesitation. If fewer than about one in five of them is

passing, we would conclude that Pass is not a logical

alternative and would allow your call. If a fair

number were passing and your opponents got a

worse result as a consequence of you bidding, then

we would disallow your second bid and adjust the

result as though you had passed. Of course we

would still have to consider whether or not your

partner might bid over 3t, so there might be several

possible outcomes, leading to a 'weighted ruling'.

From next issue Robin Barker, Deputy Chief

Tournament Director, will be taking on this

column. Robin is a very experienced director

and one of the most qualified in England. He

is editor of the White Book arobin@ebu.co.ukp>forward to answering your questions. Please

email him - robin@ebu.co.uk.

The author, English Bridge and the EBU are not

responsible if the information provided is incorrect or

incomplete.

S

atish Panchamia asked, 'I would be grateful if

EBU directors could provide guidance in

circumstances where the final contracts are

disallowed by a director under the relevant EBU

laws and, more specifically, the extent to which

any such director could award an adjusted score

in favour of the non-offending pairs by looking at

the Deep Finesse analysis given in the relevant

hand record.

'I ask this question because the number of tricks

making (or not making as the case may be) on any

given optimum contract on such Deep Finesse

analysis is often based on the 'best defence and

best declarer play' as well as, sometimes, on an

obscure line of play and finding a singleton king.

Any guidance given would be useful to the club

directors.'

When giving an adjusted score the director

should be examining the likely outcomes, which

may well not be those found by Deep Finesse. If it is

unclear which of several outcomes may be

achieved, it is appropriate to give a 'weighted score',

giving a percentage of the matchpoints (or IMPs)

achieved by each of several possible results.

Deep Finesse is only really helpful in these

circumstances as a prompt for possible outcomes -

sometimes it helps a director see something that

would not otherwise be obvious. r

Earlier this year we asked clubs for feedback about

the National Grading Scheme (NGS) and in

particular about the concession whereby one

player in each game may choose for their result

(and optionally their partner's) not to be graded

if they are playing as a host with an unfamiliar

partner.

Following the feedback we have had, we have

decided not to change the basic requirements for

opting out but we will be instituting a system

whereby anyone who wants to opt out will, in

addition to selecting the appropriate option in

their scoring programme, need to notify us using

a form in their MyEBU area of the website as soon

as they know they will be playing. We hope this

will allay any concerns that players could abuse

the system, while still allowing those clubs who

see opting out as a helpful option for running

their beginners and improvers games to continue

using it.

More detail about this will be sent to relevant

clubs and members as well as being shown on the

EBU website. One thing for all players to

remember is that if you think your NGS grade

does not accurately reflect your ability, you may

always choose for it to be 'private' until you

recover your rightful position.

SMALL CHANGES TO NGS

OPT-OUT SCHEME

Please recycle

this magazine when

you have inished

with it

Index

  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064
  65. Page 0065
  66. Page 0066
  67. Page 0067
  68. Page 0068
  69. Page 0069
  70. Page 0070
  71. Page 0071
  72. Page 0072
  73. Page 0073
  74. Page 0074
  75. Page 0075
  76. Page 0076
  77. Page 0077
  78. Page 0078
  79. Page 0079
  80. Page 0080
  81. Page 0081
  82. Page 0082

powered by PageTiger