Page 0025


The ERB's role in project review

All ERBs, whether national, regional or institutional, will usually carry out some form of project review1

. This is

a crucial part of the ethical framework of legislation regulating animal use and involves evaluating:

 the likely harms to animals and potential benefits of a project and how these balance i.e. a harm-benefit

analysis, and

 how the 3Rs will be implemented, throughout the duration of the project, from initial idea through to completion.

Project review is carried out prospectively (at the project application stage) and there may also be interim review

(while a project is on-going) and retrospective review (after the project is completed).

Processes for review of project applications vary2

. In some ERBs a single committee reviews all applications and

amendments. In others (usually ERBs in large institutions), smaller "project review groups" may carry out this work

and report to a central, overarching committee. The central committee may then choose to review applications of

particular concern, such as those involving novel techniques or procedures that cause severe suffering.

Some ERBs (mainly institutional) review individual studies carried out within a project as they arise, particularly if

the project itself is very broadly framed. There may also be "fast track" procedures for review of certain categories

of work, such as minor amendments to existing project authorisations. Some ERBs always meet face to face,

whereas others conduct much of their business via e-mail. The latter can be expedient, but the former enables

better dialogue. Applicants for project authorisation may attend ERB meetings to present their proposed work,

and this is particularly helpful in facilitating discussion of applications and resolving any concerns swiftly.

Whatever form it takes, it is important for the ERB to be clear about the outcomes it expects from the review

process, and about how these outcomes are achieved and evaluated in practice.

Institutional factors that impact on project review

It is difficult to appreciate potential benefits and likely harms without knowledge of institutional factors that impact

on animal care and use and quality of science. This includes the facilities and the expertise available to carry out

the work, and especially how the use of animals will be managed (e.g. the institutional processes for monitoring

animals and implementing humane end-points). Understanding such factors is important, as both harms and

benefits can be influenced as much by how a procedure is carried out, as by the nature of the procedure itself.

Developing a comprehensive knowledge of these issues will be much easier for participants in ERBs at an

institutional level rather than in national or regional ERBs. Moreover, institutional review can bring a range of

other benefits to project review, such as those listed overleaf.


Reviewing project applications

Review of applications to carry out studies on animals is a major part of the work of most ERBs. This

chapter examines the ERB's role in project review and describes the principles involved in carrying out

a harm-benefit analysis, together with some practical factors for consideration.

1 Or procedure, or protocol (see definitions, page 5) or study review.

2 See Appendix 1 for how the UK AWERB review relates to the formal authorisation process by the Home Office.


  1. Page 0001
  2. Page 0002
  3. Page 0003
  4. Page 0004
  5. Page 0005
  6. Page 0006
  7. Page 0007
  8. Page 0008
  9. Page 0009
  10. Page 0010
  11. Page 0011
  12. Page 0012
  13. Page 0013
  14. Page 0014
  15. Page 0015
  16. Page 0016
  17. Page 0017
  18. Page 0018
  19. Page 0019
  20. Page 0020
  21. Page 0021
  22. Page 0022
  23. Page 0023
  24. Page 0024
  25. Page 0025
  26. Page 0026
  27. Page 0027
  28. Page 0028
  29. Page 0029
  30. Page 0030
  31. Page 0031
  32. Page 0032
  33. Page 0033
  34. Page 0034
  35. Page 0035
  36. Page 0036
  37. Page 0037
  38. Page 0038
  39. Page 0039
  40. Page 0040
  41. Page 0041
  42. Page 0042
  43. Page 0043
  44. Page 0044
  45. Page 0045
  46. Page 0046
  47. Page 0047
  48. Page 0048
  49. Page 0049
  50. Page 0050
  51. Page 0051
  52. Page 0052
  53. Page 0053
  54. Page 0054
  55. Page 0055
  56. Page 0056
  57. Page 0057
  58. Page 0058
  59. Page 0059
  60. Page 0060
  61. Page 0061
  62. Page 0062
  63. Page 0063
  64. Page 0064